📚

Dynamic Assessment in Speech Language Pathology

May 14, 2025

SLP Nerdcast - Dynamic Assessment of Language and Literacy

Presenters

  • Kate Grambois
  • Amy
  • Dr. Trina Spencer
  • Dr. Doug Peterson

Overview

  • Discusses dynamic assessment in the field of Speech Language Pathology (SLP).
  • Importance of differentiating between language disability and language difference.
  • Applications and implications of dynamic assessment in educational settings.

Dynamic Assessment

  • Definition: A learning assessment focusing on how a child learns rather than what they have already learned.
  • Purpose: To identify disorders and inform instruction.

Validity in Assessment

  • Star Trek Example: Used to illustrate the concept of validity.
  • Tests should measure what they are intended to measure, e.g., language learning vs. language knowledge.

Issues with Norm-Referenced Tests

  • Not always reliable for diverse populations.
  • Often result in bias, over/under diagnosis.
  • Inadequate for identifying language disorders due to construct mismatch.
  • Studies show overlapping scores between children with and without language disorders.

Application of Dynamic Assessment

  • Test-Teach-Test Format: Collapsed into shorter timeframes.
  • Can identify language learning disabilities more accurately than norm-referenced tests.
  • Proven effective across diverse populations and for different constructs such as narratives and vocabulary.

Dynamic Assessment in Literacy

  • Example of decoding assessment in kindergarten:
    • Measures a child's ability to learn to decode, not just current knowledge.
    • High accuracy in predicting decoding difficulties with a short assessment.

Informing Intervention

  • Early identification through dynamic assessment allows for targeted interventions.
  • Enables instructional planning based on a child's learning ability and not just performance.

Recommendations for Clinicians

  • Incorporate dynamic assessments for better, more inclusive results.
  • Use dynamic assessment to uncover learning potential and inform intervention, not just for diagnosis.
  • Autonomy in choosing assessment methods; evidence-based practice should guide decisions.

Additional Resources

  • Dynamic assessments developed by language dynamics group available for use.
  • Encourage reading of related literature for further understanding.

Closing Remarks

  • Dynamic assessment offers a more ethical, inclusive, and accurate approach to evaluating language learning disabilities.
  • Clinicians are encouraged to adopt dynamic assessment practices to improve the cultural competence and effectiveness of their evaluations.