Lecture Notes on Discontinuous Galerkin Method and Numerical Fluxes
Key Concepts
Discontinuous Galerkin Method (DG)
Involves clean formulation of discontinuous lurking formulation.
Introduction of new domains:
( \tilde{\Omega} \gamma ): broken element or domain volume.
Mesh skeleton.
New Operators Introduced
Average operator.
Jump operator (unintuitive definition).
Numerical Flux Selection
Importance of selecting a numerical flux with specific properties:
Consistency
Definition: ( \hat{F}(\Phi, \Psi) = F(\Phi) )
Ensures that if the solution is single valued, the numerical flux equals the true flux.
Conservativity
Definition: Jump of ( f ) is zero.
A single-valued flux guarantees conservation properties in the solution.
Why Consistency and Conservativity Matter
Consistency
If the method is consistent, it ensures convergence.
Guarantees that the true solution will satisfy the finite element formulation (variational consistency).
A consistent method will converge under mesh refinement.
Conservativity
Ensures that the numerical flux is single-valued on both sides of the boundary, maintaining conservation properties.
A conservative flux simplifies the formulation, leading to cleaner numerical results.
Mathematical Implications
If a flux is conservative:
The equation simplifies as the jump becomes zero.
This leads to clear relations in conservation laws for each element.
Test Function Argument
Choosing a test function that is one inside a single element and zero elsewhere helps demonstrate conservation properties.
This is possible due to the discontinuous nature of the method; not feasible in continuous methods.
Final Thoughts
Emphasis on ensuring that numerical fluxes are consistent and conservative to accurately reflect the physics of the relevant partial differential equations.
Next steps include exploring different examples of numerical fluxes and analyzing their properties.