✈️

Russian Military Aircraft Development: Past, Present, and Future

Jul 13, 2024

Russian Military Aircraft Development: Past, Present, and Future

Overview of the Mig MFI and the Sukhoi Su-47

Mig MFI Project

  • Background: Initiated in the early 1980s to counter American advancements, specifically the F-22 Raptor.
  • Key Requirements: Super maneuverability, multi-role capability, supersonic cruise without afterburners, low radar cross-section.
  • Development: Mig Bureau and Sukhoi were the main competitors. Mig won, leading to the I90/MFI designation.
  • Design Features: Delta wing with canards, large variable intake ramps, s-shaped ducts, AL-41F engines with thrust vectoring and ceramic coating.
  • Capabilities: Could carry 12 missiles internally; capable of backward missile launch for dogfight advantages.
  • Problems and Demise: Funding issues post-1991 USSR dissolution; scrapped LFI development to focus on MFI but still failed to secure enough support. Sukhoi's self-funded Su-47 led to MFI project's demise. Project officially canceled in 1997, with some work continuing until 2000.

Sukhoi Su-47

  • Background: Developed along with the Su-27 KM and aimed to be a naval fighter. Later became a competitor to Mig MFI.
  • Development: Self-funded by Sukhoi, first flight in 1997. Redesignated from S37 to Su-47 around 2001.
  • Design Features: Forward-swept wings using composite materials, two D-30F6 engines, thrust vectoring for high maneuverability.
  • Capabilities: Speed of over Mach 2.2, internal weapons bay with rotating launcher, integrated systems for reduced radar cross-section.
  • Outcome: Used as a tech demonstrator, contributing to Pak-Fa (Su-57) development. Was not adopted for mass production.

Further Developments and Comparisons

Sukhoi Su-57

  • Design and Development: Began in early 2000s as Pak-Fa project post-Mig MFI failure. Revealed in 2010 as T-50 prototype.
  • Design Features: Similarities to F-22/YF-23. Emphasized high performance first, stealth second. Integrated avionics and radar systems.
  • Issues: Stealth performance debated; uses AL-41 engines based on older models; future models will have upgraded Izdeliye-30 engines.
  • Capabilities: Radar cross-section comparatively higher than F-22/F-35, but incorporates L-band radars and new EW systems for advanced combat scenarios.
  • Operational Use: Around 10+ units in service, used in Syria and potentially in Ukraine. Full production and deployment still slow-moving.

Potential and Future Projects

Su-75 Checkmate

  • Design: Single-engine, lighter, and cheaper stealth fighter potentially rivaling F-35. Intended for both manned and unmanned roles.
  • Capabilities: Mac 1.8 without afterburners, AI-assisted operations, versatile weapons bay.
  • Target Market: Intended for international sales; display and marketing aimed at countries like UAE, India, Vietnam.

Mig 41 (Pak-DP)

  • Purpose: Next-gen interceptor to replace Mig 31, potentially exceeding SR-71's speed.
  • Design: High speed (Mac 3.5+), long-range interception, stealth enhancements.
  • Armament: New long-range missiles, Hypersonic options, and anti-satellite capabilities.
  • Status: Development ongoing, with many features still speculative.

Pak-DA

  • Purpose: Long-range strategic stealth bomber to replace older Tu-95 and Tu-160 models.
  • Capabilities: Stealth over speed, subsonic cruising, equipped with modern and potentially Hypersonic missiles.
  • Status: Development and first flights projected within the next few years; significant time required to confirm capabilities.

Conclusion

  • Soviet Legacy: Russian aviation has consistently aimed to build on its Cold War legacy, with varied success rates in modern times.
  • Challenges and Advances: Financial, technological, and strategic challenges exist, but projects like the Su-57, potential of Su-75, and Pak-DA continue to push the envelope.
  • Ongoing Evolution: Despite setbacks, Russian military aviation continues to innovate, aiming to match or exceed Western advancements.

Key Learnings

  • The fall of the Soviet Union led to significant challenges in funding and development for Russian air forces.
  • Sukhoi's initiative and self-funding strategy played a critical role in its current dominance in Russian fighter jet development.
  • Current Russian advancements focus on combining legacy technology with modern capabilities, but financial and political stability remain crucial for future success.