The conversation repeatedly questions the notion that water is wet.
There is a repetitive assertion that water being wet is incorrect.
The argument uses the analogy of taking a shower to suggest that water makes other things wet, rather than being wet itself.
Counterarguments:
If water wasn't wet, one would remain dry when coming into contact with it.
The logic is presented that if water makes things wet, it should inherently be wet itself.
The argument is made that common sense dictates water is wet, drawing parallels with other obvious truths:
Grass is green.
Ice is cold.
Fire is hot.
Rebuttal to "Internet Says":
The statement "the internet says water isn't wet" is countered with skepticism, suggesting the internet contains false information.
Logical Fallacies Highlighted:
If something isn't dry, it must be wet, and vice versa, leading to the conclusion that not acknowledging water as wet implies it is dry.
Conclusion of Discussion:
The conversation ends with an emphasis on a lack of understanding from the side arguing against water being wet, suggesting they hold an unreasonable stance.