Notes on Locke's View and Military Conscription

Locke's Idea of Government by Consent

Question: What are the limits on government that the majority can't override?
Property rights: Democratically elected government can tax people for the common good but doesn't need each individual's consent.
Right to life and self-possession: Government can conscript people; the authority should not be arbitrary.
Consent: Matters in joining society and agreeing to be bound by the majority, not to specific taxes or military orders.
Rule of Law: Government must govern by generally applicable laws.

Debate on the legitimacy of military conscription.
U.S. policy options for recruitment:
1. Increase pay and benefits.
2. Implement a lottery system for conscription.
3. Hire mercenaries.
Historical context: Civil War used conscription with a buyout provision.

Criticisms:
- Coercion, especially for those with lower incomes.
- Puts a price on human life.
Defenses:
- Individuals can choose, potentially reducing coercion.
Debate on coercion vs. free choice.

Critique: Could involve coercive recruitment strategies based on economic status.
Patriotism vs. monetary incentive as motivation for military service.

Discussion on reproductive markets: Egg and sperm donation, surrogacy.
Baby M case: Surrogacy contract disputed; debate on enforceability.
- Arguments for enforceability: Voluntary agreement.
- Arguments against: Lack of informed consent, emotional bonds, potential dehumanization.

Ethical considerations on treating reproductive capacities as marketable commodities.
Argument against commodification: Certain goods should not be treated as objects of use.
Philosophical perspective: Elizabeth Anderson on alienated labor and inappropriate valuation.

Discussion raises broader questions about consent, market transactions, and the proper valuation of certain goods.
Future focus on philosophical exploration of these themes.