💔

Understanding Attachment Theory and Maternal Impact

Apr 24, 2025

Attachment Theory and Maternal Deprivation

Focus of Attachment Unit

  • Previously focused on healthy mother-infant attachments.
  • Current focus on disrupted mother-infant relationships.

John Bowlby's Theory of Maternal Deprivation

  • Monotropy: Infants form a unique, strong bond with the mother, providing a secure base.
  • Critical Period: Up to 30 months post-birth; bonding interruptions lead to maternal deprivation.
    • Prolonged effects noted up to 5 years.
  • Consequences of Maternal Deprivation:
    • Poor social development, delinquency, emotional issues.
    • Emotional development hindered, leading to affectional psychopathy.
    • Intellectual development impaired, lower IQ.
    • Internal working model: Foundation for future relationships.
    • Continuity hypothesis: Ineffective internal working model affects future relationships and parenting.

Bowlby's 44 Thieves Study

  • Compared emotionally disturbed boys who were thieves to those who weren't.
  • Thieves more likely to have experienced prolonged separation during the critical period;
    • Linked to delinquency and affectional psychopathy.
  • Study limitations: Correlational, can't establish causation due to factors like socioeconomic status.

Impact of Bowlby's Theory

  • Influenced public policy, social welfare systems, and hospital visitor policies.
  • Economic implications: Rising nursery care costs.
  • Social sensitivity: Increased maternity leave, potential reinforcement of traditional gender roles and pay gaps.
  • Criticisms: Gender bias, undervalues father's role.

Orphan Studies: Privation vs. Deprivation

  • Privation: Absence of emotional care; no attachment formed.
  • Romanian Revolution (1990): 170,000 children in orphanages.
  • Rutter's ERA Study (1998-2011):
    • Longitudinal study of 165 Romanian orphans adopted by British families.
    • Three adoption groups: <6 months, 6 months - 2 years, >2 years.
    • Findings: Disinhibited attachment in children adopted after 6 months; delayed growth.
    • Intellectual challenges persisted in late adoptees.

Evaluations and Implications

  • Sensitive Period: Early years more flexible than a strict critical period.
  • Policy shifts: Emphasize early adoption and infant care.
  • Study Limitations: Non-random adoption selection could bias results.
  • Further research required on long-term effects.

Related Studies

  • Hodges and Tizard (1989): Nurturing homes improve behavior.
  • Goldfarb (1947): Early fostering enhances mental agility and sociability.

Psych Boost Support and Resources

  • Patreon support allows for more educational content.
  • Offers additional resources such as exam question tutorial videos.