Now, linked to our previous story, you might have seen this piece of research out in the Telegraph this week from Matt Goodwin, the former University of Ken politics professor who is now a spokesperson for Reform UK. And it's reporting that white British people will be a minority within 40 years. So, he looks at immigration, birth, and death rate trends up towards the end of the 21st century, so by 2100. And it predicts that white British people will be a minority. They'll decline from their current position of the population as of the 2021 census, which is already out of date, but it's the best we have. So, they'll decline from their current position from being 73% of the population to 57% of the population by 2050 and slipping into a minority of 34% by 2063. The original prediction, I think it was in 2013, was that White Britain will be a minority by 2066. very symbolic of course because the Norman conquests happened in 1066 and between 1066 and 1945 we have had less migration than between 1997 and now. So in almost a thousand years there was next to no uh migration compared to since Tony Blair came in and decided to rub the rights nose in diversity and render its arguments out of date and David Cameron and Michael Gove and Richie Sunnak and Boris Johnson decided to continue the mass open borders experiment. the unwanted levels of demographic churn and cultural change inflicted upon a recalcin country by Tony Blair inflicted upon a a population that had voted against mass migration in every single election referendum since 1974. They decided to continue that experiment and now we're dealing with the inevitable consequences which shows that white Britons will become a minority in their own homeland by at least 2063 possibly earlier if trends continue to worsen. Matt's work projects a big rise in the population in the proportion of the UK population comprising foreignb born and second generation immigrants from below 20% at the moment I think it's 16% to 33.5% within the next 25 years I think it was Philip Pilington and Paul Mulland who predicted by 2083 Britain will be majority firstg generation immigrant I am going through all of this as a preamble because David Bett the professor at King's College London and former government adviser Dominic IC Cummings have said that immigration the subsequent multicultural management strategy what Eric Calfman calls unilateral multiculturalism you know telling every single culture and population except the host majority population who have to pay for the privilege of battery farming foreign nationals at their expense. Telling every single imported population they can have their culture that they're actually encouraged to set up ethnocultural silos apart from and even hostile to the host population. But if the host population complain that they're racist, these conditions are building a feebral bonfire that if ignited by the spark of something similar to the Southport massacre and subsequent protests last summer, could build into a blazing inferno of civil war. And this is not hyperbolic. There seems to be something in the air at the moment where lots of people are recognizing the same problem and lots of people are speaking to the podcast circuit and alternative media because they've said, "We've been warning the government about this for a while." And they have this sort of intractable thought blockage, this belief in the magic soil of value pluralist liberalism that by cultural osmosis, British values will seep into the skin of literally anyone who passes through the passport gates of Heather and Gatwick or rocks up at Doa Beach in a dinghy and transmute them into a productive and peaceful British system will unleash their latent egalitarian nature. And so they just won't listen to the warnings that indigestible tribal diasporas could be ignited and clash violently with weapons in the streets with the host majority who do not want this to happen and keep telling their politicians they don't want this to happen and are ignored at every single stage. So the rest of gap Matt Goodwin's research is as follows. By 2100, six in 10 people in the UK will have either not been born in the UK or have at least one immigrant parent. The Muslim population, which currently stands at 7%, is estimated to increase to more than 1 in 10 people. So that's 11.2% in the UK within the next 25 years and account for more than 1 in five, so that less than one in five, but up to one in five, 19.2% of all people in the UK by the end of the century. Reminder, it only took 17% of the population to be Muslim in Lebanon to turn the country from peaceful and Christian into a caliphate basically overnight. And bear in mind that's 17 point 17% of the population being Muslim. But let's say only a third of that are fighting age Muslim males. So and and what's particularly important in Britain is that due to a demographic breakdown that a few data analysts did for me, we know that the average age of Pakistani and Bangladeshi males in this country is half that of white Britain. So white Britain's the average age is about 44. The average age of Pakistanis and Bangladeshies is between 22 and 24. So that means the fighting age reserve force for ethnocultural violence is much younger and more plentiful and more ideologically virulent among imported Muslim ethnic enclaves than it is among the dispersed white British. Especially because their faith provides them a powerful motivating factor to form armed clans and militias. We saw that last summer with the armed Muslim mobs in Birmingham and Middlesborough during the Southport protest. And we see this reflected in the polling where only one in four British Muslims believe that Hamas committed atrocities on October the 7th. And these virulent beliefs in blasphemy laws, you know, 52% think that drawings of their prophet Muhammad should be illegal. About third want Sharia law in this country. These beliefs in Islamist doctrine are mainly concentrated among second generation, so Britishborn, university educated Muslim men aged 18 to 30. And given that Muhammad is the number one baby name in England, this demographic will only continue to grow as you can see from Matt's research. So Matt writes that foreignb born and Muslim populations were estimated to have higher fertility rate. So while Britain's UK born fertility rate, it doesn't separate by ethnicity because it's very difficult to do because data collection in this country sucks. But while the UK's born fertility rate was 1.39, it's 1.97 for foreignb born people, for Muslims it's 2.35 and for non-Muslims it's 1.54. Research forecasts that white British share of the population will decline from 73% to 44% by 2075 and 33.70%.7% by 2100. The non-white share will increase from 19.7% to 34.8% by 2050, 48.1% by 2075, and 59.3% by 2100. The analysis suggested the white population including both white British and white other so European would become a minority of the population in the year 2079. The share of the UK population that is non-Muslim will fall from 93% in 2025 to 88.8% in 2050, 84.8% in 2075 and 80.8% in the year 2100. analysis suggested the share of the population that is UK born will fall from 81% in to 39% between 2025 and 2100 and the share of population comprising people born overseas will increase from 18% to 26% over the same period the report said in other words by the end of the century by the year 2100 based on current trends around six in 10 people will not have been born in the UK or will be born to not UK born parents So, we are looking at the white British host majority becoming a demographic minority in their own homeland. And excuse me if I'm skeptical that they will be treated with the same preferential treatment that the state currently treats minorities in this country. When the whip hand is reversed, I don't think that we will be able to appeal to human rights and hate speech laws for special protections. And look, I know lots of people are optimistic about the potential for British values to cast a kind of inclusive integrative spell over the imported and second generation tribal minorities. Few problems with that. First, data from Denmark and the Netherlands shows that second generation immigrants almost always repeat the social, economic, and criminal patterns of their parents. So, it's an intergenerational issue. And secondly, therefore, unfortunately, like it or not, ethnic and demographic change is a reliable proxy for cultural change. It is not just a matter of once in a generation education programs and economic opportunities. It would need to be a matter of importing people, if we are going to at all, from very culturally approximate countries or a very select few people that have had a hard break from their unwanted birth culture. So someone like Iron Hersi for example, but the fact we can name Iron Hersi means that one among millions of Somalians might be suitable to live as one's kinsman in Britain, one's countrymen, but all the rest of the people in Mogadishu are not fit for instant importation into Manchester. It's not desired by the host majority, and it will only cause ethnocultural conflict. And this is what David Betts is warning about in his follow-up article to his original article in Military Strategy magazine about civil war coming to the West. There are some really alarming quotes in here and it's worth going through because David Betts and Dominic Cummings latest post on Substack as a really great great twin because Dominick Cummings explains why the inner apparatics of government are so clawed eared to David Betts's credible warnings about civil war and why he has in desperation turned to the alternative media sphere like Luis Perry's podcast like the New Culture Forum an upcoming event unheard to make his voice heard. So he says in the first essay Betts explained the reasons that this situation has arisen a combination of culturally fractured societies, economic stagnation, elite overreach and a collapse of public confidence in the ability of normal politics to solve problems and ultimately the realization by anti-status quo groups of plausible strategies of attack based on systems disruption of vulnerable critical infrastructure. So basically these virulent tribal groups who are getting an increase in status sponsored by the government who treats them as client constituencies for electoral politics and the expansion of state power are going to come into conflict with the host majority who are very cognizant of the downgrading of their status as the host majority. Especially when demographically they are being sent into decline. their culture is being denigrated and they are being punished by diversity, equity and inclusion and equality laws and so this will lead to factions of vigilante groups attacking critical infrastructure. He mentions in here for example the Heathrow fire where one of the transformers caught light and shut down the airport for a day. That's still being investigated. People don't know what the actual cause of that was. You know, it's been alleged that it was a Russian interference hack as as was the Marks and Spencer's computer system going down recently, but that could well be cover for vigilante action. The sort of vigilante action we saw, for example, with the Blade Runners defacing and taking down Ulle's cameras in London, which I of course could not endorse, but uh given Sadi Khan's unpopularity and his punitive sun worship tax on London tradesmen, I'm not shocked that it's happened. But if that is the trend, then any of these virulent ethnocultural groups, either the the upset host majority or more likely the armed tribal minorities could do the same thing and cut off supply chains, electricity, food, water to densely built up urban areas where this demographic and cultural situation is most febral because they're the most diverse and it's the place where the host majority are already minorities, you know, Birmingham, Leicester, Leeds, Manchester, London, where only up to about a third of the population is white British. So, David Betts in this article predicts there is an 18.5% chance that civil war occurs in Britain and or France in the next 5 years. And then he gives it an 87 to 95% chance that it happens in one of 15 likely countries. So that's very daunting especially if you are currently living in a city in Britain and France. I would say it is not alarmist to make plans and an exit strategy and have your family around. He says, "As for casualties, if we take Britain as an example with a population of 70 million and assume levels of violence as bad as the worst year of the Northern Ireland conflict, 1971, uh, with 500 deaths in a population of 1.5 million, then 23,300 killed per year would be expected. If we take the Bosnian war of the 1990s or the more recent Syrian war as indicators, we might hazard a guess that between 1 and 4% of the pre-war population will be killed with many times more that amount displaced. This brings me to the matter of to whom this article is addressed. And this is particularly interesting. The first intended audience is statesmen, a constituency which I hope will get the message that the danger is clear and present to use jargon. The second is a general public. That's me and you. This is intended to be shared on shows like this. To whom I wish to say, no, you are not taking crazy pills. The feeling you have had that something like this is going seriously wrong is right. So this is not alarmist to say that civil war is a possibility bearing on likelihood. I I really try not to create clickbait content on this channel. I really try not to be alarmist if I can manage it. I am very disturbed by this because David Betts is a credible academic who delivers things in a very sober and somber way. He is not a sensationalist. This article is not sensationalist. But to give it a 18% chance that some sort of civil strife kicks off in the next five years to say that our political elite are aware of this and instead are trying to glue the lid shut on the on the sputtering demographic and cultural pot to ensure that the downgrading of the white British host majority continues a pace and they dedicate state resources with the Raichu unit in the home office for example to gaslighting them out of believing that there is something wrong with immigration multiculture. ism and the post Blair settlement in their country that they continue to rub their nose in diversity while telling them they can't complain or defend themselves when their own daughters are attacked at a pop concert in Manchester Arena. This is really dangerous and I think like bets I'm very concerned that the government are just like on rails at this point and there are too many vested interests in the civil service like the home offic's Islamic network 700 strong Muslim activist network who continue to give preferential treatment to Muslims who work to deter uh Christian asylum seekers from this country while continuing to increase Muslim immigration. I am very concerned that there are too many forces at work in the British state to stop this from happening. The only thing we can do is keep talking about it. Um because otherwise people wouldn't even be aware about it. Now Bett is explicit about the cause of civil conflict. In this piece, he says, "Western governments under increasing structural civilizational distress and having squandered their legitimacy, see co are losing the ability to peacefully manage multicultural societies that are terminally fractured by ethnic identity politics. The initial result is an accelerating descent of multiple major cities into marginally feral status as defined by Richard Norton in a 2003 essay in this way." And he says, "A metropolis with a population of more than a million people in a state government of which has lost the ability to maintain the rule of law within the city's boundaries, yet remains a functioning actor in the greater international system. basically clinging to international law while enforcing a naroty at home and giving preferential treatment to tribal indigestible minority groups who are most likely to be violent and least likely to practice impulse control and to universalize their ethic beyond that which advantages their clan, their family, their ethnicity, their race and their um because the white working-class British host majority do not have a very strong ethnic or racial consciousness because they kind of just take people as they meet. It's one of the great strengths of Britain when you have a high trust homogeneous ethnic and cultural pot. It's why, for example, the very few minorities that have come over that period between 1066 and 1945, let's say Jews into London in the 19th century, were able to assimilate with with very little problems because they made friends with the high trust white British host majority. Actually, there's a there was a Jewish chap at a recent event. Look forward to a clip coming out of that soon with Gadsad, Matt Goodwin, Eric Calfman, and Batia Saragon after I argued with Batunga Saragon because she said it was disgusting to suggest that you could say Islam is incompatible with Britain. After I had a had an argument with her and the audience took my side, there was a young Jewish chap who stood up and said, "Look, my father said this to me that we are a guest in this country and so we should want the the thriving of our homeowners that the those who are giving us hospitality, those who are our hosts. And if we misbehave and start wrecking the furniture, we should expect to be turfed out. And that should apply to all guests in all homes and all guests in all countries. All people who visit a country are here at the request and behest of the host majority. And so you need to make friends with that host majority. You can't just take for granted that the state will continue to enforce value pluralism by crushing the cultural identity of the host majority and demoting their status to either be on par with or subordinate to imported ethnic and cultural client blocks and then you cannot expect that state of affairs to stand and be stabilized. And he's absolutely right. And so if you build cities where we are a nation of strangers, as Karma said, where you don't know your neighbors, where there is a low level of social trust, where everyone regards each other as suspicion, and where everyone is from everywhere, so you can never hope to get to know people, integration is impossible. If you don't live around the host majority, and the host majority are just not present in their own capital cities or large cities. Then you get this environment where the city itself becomes ungovernable just in terms of if it were to break out into widespread vigilante violence, something none of us want, but there are just not enough police officers to contain it. You can see that the 2020 riots in America, various democrat controlled cities. But also, if if that violence does break out, then how do you get resources into the city? The city itself can't produce its own food. It's reliant on power generated away from the city because often power plants are placed outside of cities and you know they run the power in via the national grid to avoid a potential meltdown or disaster at the power plant from claiming lots of lives. So if the power is sabotaged, if the supply chains are sabotaged, if the city becomes ungovernable as Leicester was in 2022 when Indians and Pakistanis rioted over a cricket match and the white British host majority didn't want to be involved, then the cities themselves become they become like no man's land in the Batman comics. They become city. They become these ungovernable dystopic hellscapes and it's all the government's fault. And and Betts writes, "The concept, as further explored by Norton and others, is understood to encompass a range of contingencies of increasing ferality, usually explained with a simple green, non-feral, amber, marginally or partially feral, or red actively or incipently feral typology. In 2003, the exemplary feral city according to Norton was Mogadishu, Somalia. It is worth bearing in mind that last year, in the first, I think it was quarter of last year, we imported more Somalians on family reunification visas than we did chemists, biologists, and engineers from all countries combined. We will end up recreating the violent tribal conditions of the third world by importing the peoples of the third world, especially encouraging that they recreate those conditions by creating ethnocultural silos. And especially if they are encouraged to have their prejudices against their host population nurtured by not needing to form healthy relationships with them to be the recipients of charity by the state just taking money and giving it to them in the form of social housing and benefit subsidies. Remember 72% of Somalians in this country are in social housing. Why am I paying to house Somalians in my country which provide me with no benefit? Absolutely no clue. But also if they're told to nurture these postimperial historical racial and religious grievances by a government that enables through its law and encourages through its hiring practices this kind of tribal ethnic clanishness among imported minorities while clamping down on any collective identity be it national or cultural or the host majority. So that they're actively recreating the conditions of Mogadishu at the height of its civil conflict in Britain and then rather than averting course and and changing tact, they're just telling the the white British host majority, well, when the inevitable happens, don't look back in anger. As of 2024, Betts writes, "A list of global cities exhibiting some or all of the characteristics of amber and red ferality, such as high levels of political corruption, negotiated areas of police control, if not outright no-go zones, decaying industries, crumbling infrastructure, unsustainable debt, two-tier policing, and the burgeoning of private security would include many in the West." He has just described London really worrying. The direction of the situation, moreover, is greater ferality. And he's done a map here of the the French elections to show the sort of uh white spots where the ethnic enclaves are built up. And they say simply put the major cities are radically more diverse and have a growing mutually hostile political relationship with the country in which they're embedded. London being the best example. Everyone in the outer London burs which is still majority English like Beexley and Brmley hate Sadi Khan. They hate the fact that he's imposed u on them. They hate the fact that their their transport system is expensive and that ethnic minorities can just bump the barriers or board the bus without paying their fair. They hate the fact that Sadi Khan said that English people do not represent London. They hate the fact that he said that terror attacks are just part and parcel of living in a big city. They hate the fact there are diversity bards everywhere. They hate the fact that night crime is out of control. And yet Sadi Khan runs London like his own personal thief because all of the ethnic minorities that live in London, they're the recipients of benefits and social housing that especially the Muslim population see themselves in him. And when he says we need more housing, socialized subsidized taxpayer housing near mosques so that Muslims can get to mosque easier. When he says all those things, they vote for him. So it's almost impossible to remove him. So ethnic sectarianism is happening at the level of government supported by tribal imported ethnic minorities and the government who sit in Westminster who ostensibly represent the people that live outside of those cities and so should be speaking to the concerns of nine in 10 constituencies in this country who want immigration lowered even when they underestimate levels of immigration by a factor of 10. They are doing nothing to stop this. That's why David Betts is so worried. What's the number one reason that things will get worse? Well, David Betts points it out. Immigration, multiculturalism, all things that the government could stop tomorrow and that they are refusing to do so. So, what will happen? Bet says putting these factors together allows one to outline the trajectory of the coming civil wars. So, it's just a foregone conclusion. First, the major cities become ungovernable, i.e. feral, exhausting the ability of the police, even with military assistance to maintain civil order, while the broader perception of systemic political legitimacy plummets beyond recovery. Worth noting as well, remember when the pro Palestine marches were happening every weekend in Westminster, the police had said after his butier called for jihad on the streets of London, that jihad has a number of meanings. And their Muslim community's advisory board, which many police forces have in this country, the fact they have one in the first place shows that they're ideologically corrupted. But a chap on it was called Muhammad Cosbar and he had to be fired because he had praised Hamas masters of the ma martrs and the masters of resistance. Basically a statement of intent to repeat October 7th here and our security agencies are so infested by Muslim ideologues they will probably stand by and let it happen. Really really worrying. Betts continues the economy is crippled by metastasizing intercomunal violence and consequent internal displacement. Second, these feral cities come to be seen by many of the indigenes of the titular nationality. So the host majority now living outside them as effectively having been lost to foreign occupation. They then directly attack the exposed city support systems with a view to causing their collapse through systemic failure. So he's worried about basically white vigilante groups trying to accelerate the collapse of cities. But then of course the demographic and cultural groups won't be confined to the cities if they lose power, lose food, lose water. So they'll spew out from the cities into the suburbs and so you'll have them going house to house as happened on October 7th where they were knocking on doors and setting lights to safe rooms. Really worrying. He's got a map of the UK here basically saying this is a representation of the UK's infrastructure. This is a lot of the places where it's centralized. This is where people could could attack it. Shore up its defenses quick. He says that civil war is looming in the west is a logical conclusion of standard well understood precepts of social science. The likely fracture of multicultural societies along the lines of ethnic uh along the lines of identity but ethnic identity is an obvious hypothesis. The configuration of demographic geography and the factional polarization that is its political consequence is a measurable fact. The precariousness of contemporary urbanity is a thing which geographers have worried over for at least half a century. In short, the situation which I have described above is unpleasant, but it is not controversial as far as our grasp of current reality and theoretical understanding of how society's functioned is concerned. Again, people like like my friend and former colleague at Loy is Cole Benjamin have questioned why Betts has been writing about this and speaking about it to the alternative media circuit. Well, Dominic Cummings provides some insight here because the politicians aren't listening. They know all this. They've been briefed on it time and time again in cabinet and Cobra meetings. They just don't care. They won't avert course. They are locked into one train of thought that puts them on the path on rails ineluctably towards civil war and they continue to worsen the ethnocultural conditions that will lead to it. So Cummings has got this this piece on Substack saying people ideas machines and this is post 12. And when you get past all of the various quotes that he's peppered in, he says, "Inside the intelligence services, special forces themselves under attack from the Cabinet Office and NI office as they operate as our last line of defense. See below. Bits of Whiteall and those most connected to discussions away from Westminster. There is growing, though still tiny discussion of Britain's slide into chaos and the potential for serious violence, including what would look like racial, ethnic, mob, gang violence, though the regime would obviously try to describe it differently. He means David bets a civil war. Part of the reason for the incoherent forcefulness against the white riers last year in Southport and he says riers but he means peaceful protesters and people's posts on social media like Lucy Connley, Wayne Rock, Julie Sweeney, and the late Peter Lynch. But part of the incoherent forcefulness against the white writers last year from a regime that is in deep surrender mode against pro- holocaust marchers, rape gangs, and criminals generally is a mix of a aesthetic revulsion in the SW1 at the Brexit voting white north. So the white working-class victims of the rape gangs who they just don't want to mix with. If you drop them in a buttlands, they would feel really uncomfortable. Therefore, they don't want anything to do with them. and B, incoherent white hall terror of widespread white English mobs turning political and attracting talented political entrepreneurs. The rise of reform, even though reform themselves are not nearly as radical as they are being made out to be by the fevered imaginations of the disconnected liberal progressive governing class. They're already privately quaking about the growth of Muslim networks. So the Muslim vote, the Muslim Council of Britain, the sectarian independent candidates elected at the last general election and all of the Labour cabinet members like Jess Phillips and West Streeting seats that are coming under threat from these sectarian Muslim voting blocks. The last thing they want to see is emerging networks that see themselves as both political and driven to consider violence. Part of the system increasingly fear that this could spin out of control into their worst nightmare. In number 10 meetings with the Met on riots, I saw for myself a the weird psychological zone of how much order rests not on actual physical forces, but perceptions among a few elites about such forces that can very quickly change. So basically, they need to convince themselves that they're in control even though they don't feel in control. It's like the Bane thing of do you feel in control? They themselves need to impotently insist that they are king without being able to demonstrate a right or capacity to rule. And so they are petrified that they will be perceived as illegitimate and that this perception of illegitimacy will be the catalyst to violence in the streets as different ethnocultural blocks vi to not be the downgraded in status constituency and B Cummings writes how scared the senior police are at the prospect of crucial psychological spells being broken. We can see them on the streets that various forces have already realized the regime will not stop them. What if this spreads? White Hall's pathology has pushed it to the brink of this psychological barrier and many of them know it. And again, it's very important to say that the diversity, equity, and inclusion policies practiced under the yoke of complying with the law like the public sector equality act, public sector equality duty under the equality act 2010 has stationed in the security services and police forces these virulent tribal minorities. See, for example, during the Southport riots last year, the chap and the blue high vest that said, "All right, lads, if you go and stash your weapons in the mosque, there'll be no trouble." Now, I don't think Barry and Gary have been told, "Yeah, go and put your bricks and bats in the local Weather Spoons, boys, and we'll let you off with a warning. There's differential treatment here. And if the state themselves are packed to the rafters with these virulent tribal minorities, whose side will the state takes if it all kicks off? If they're even capable of taking a side if things spiral out of their control anyway." Cummings writes, "Aspects of the situation are tragic comic. If you talk to senior peoples in place like the UAE, the United Arab Emirates, they tell you that big shots in that region now tell each other, "Don't send your kids to be educated in Britain, they'll come back as radical Islamist nut jobs." And this isn't an exaggeration. There was a political analyst here that you can see, uh, Amjad Taha, and he was interviewed shortly before ARC in February to by Camila Tomminy on on GB News, and he said, "I think you have more extremists in the UK than you have in the Middle East." Absolutely. The things Islamists say in various mosques we have seen online, the terminology they use and statements they would make would not be allowed in Afghanistan. The Muslim Brotherhood, Islamists, the main ones who are ruling and controlling various press when it comes to the Muslim society. They control the whole narrative and the Islamists use freedom of speech in a manner where they will be anti-semitic in the name of freedom of speech. And I would say obviously anti-British because there is a statement of intent by the pro Palestinian mobs when they say inifard from the river to the sea when they declare a war on on the west more collectively that not only is Britain responsible for establishing the state of Israel by handing over the British mandate to Palestine over to the Israeli government in 1948 but also that they are decadent, they are immodest in their dress, that they are Christians and they are not members of the so they deserve the same treatment as the Jews do according to the hadiths on judgement. day. So even if one is not Jewish, like I'm not, you recognize that this virulent Islamic mob has the same intentions towards you as a white Christian Englishman as they do towards their neighbors in the state of Israel. So look back to Cummings's piece. He says, "Our regime has spent 30 years a destroying border control and sane immigration, including the home offices jihad against the highest skilled whom they truly loathe discussing and try to repel the stupid fees." again see the home office Islamic network and the Boris wave which I don't think that Cummings himself can exculpate all responsibility for retroactively but there you go and B actively prioritizing people from the most barbaric places on earth hence immigration from the tribal areas most responsible for the grooming and rape gangs keeps rising that's merepur in Pakistan where to hear Ali the Labour MP wants to build an airport for more direct flights I ratioed him with unless it receives more deportation flights than departure flights we're not interested. Thank you very much. And C, Cummings writes, funding the spread of those barbaric ideas and defending the organization spreading them with human rights laws designed to stop the return of totalitarianism in Europe. See, the United Nations and the UN refugee agency sponsoring Hamas. In parallel, they've started propaganda operations with the old media to spread the meme that our real danger is the far right code for white people. Again, he has sat in government meetings. He knows this is the case. The far right is a phantom spectre, an ideological imposition on the parochial concerns of the white British host majority about being downgraded in their own country and the subsequent treatment that they will face by imported tribal, ethnic, and religious minorities should they suddenly have more than just de facto power, but be the ruling power in the country. As Tories and Labor have continued their deranged trajectory, they have provoked exactly the reactions they most feared, including the spreading meme that our regime itself has become the enemy and the growing politicization of white English nationalism. These deep state discussions about the growing prospect of violence like the focus group discussions about civil war. So, David Betts has been having these conversations, he just hasn't been listened to, have seeped through to our M a few MPs or hacks. And the evolution of the cabinet office in recent years has excluded ministers spads and PM from almost any visibility inside the national security act of the CO. So this is due to Tony Blair putting the civil service on rails with the constitutional reform and governance act of 2010 and saying that any interference in the cabinet office or the civil service is breaking the civil service code. So ministers are basically glorified rubber stampers for whatever the civil service writes and the civil service appoint themselves. So the civil service are actually running the country and they're running it really really badly. So what you need to do is repeal all that legislation so that the government of the day can avert course and prevent this awful state of affairs. So Cummings writes this has acquired more power from the rest of the security intelligence system and runs a failing empire within a failing empire. When I said in 2020 that among the general changes to the dysfunctional number 10 CO system, the oversight of NSS must change so they become visible and legible again to the PM's office so we could participate in debates like what are the actual priorities of the intelligence services via Putin and Xiinping. Some senior officials tried to pretend that zero political scrutiny of NSS was somehow a constitutional principle. 2010 Constitutional Reform and Governance Act must be gotten rid of. After I left, this system became even more closed and dysfunctional. Hence, the total lack of true strategic thinking connecting ends, ways, means over Ukraine and all things defense procurement becoming more and more CFKA-esque as the MOD shipped off stuff to Ukraine. I repeat, the lack of legibility of the NSS is without historical precedent in the UK for centuries and is related to broader issues of White Hall's dysfunction, the disgraceful shambles of the MOD, etc. basically via legislation and by the fact that the politicians themselves are unintelligent conformists they are locked into a way of thinking and therefore just aren't listening to the likes of David Betts and on certain issues Dominic Cummings and he says he writes down later being a dead player optimized to defend the institutions at all costs no matter how pathological and he's describing K star here star has aping sunnac synthesized the political advice of Morgan Mcweeny and the priority of the officials and lawyers actually running number 10 which is like Lord Herma who says that if you want to leave the ECR because it keeps deploying foreign criminals in your country and keeps them here because they'd like domestic chicken nuggets you're literally a Nazi. He's saying that Kstama has generated his own version of Rishi Sununak's demented combination of you know believing his own hype and that he's he's completely correct. If you're not in the meetings, you can't accurately estimate the relative levels of dishonesty and self-d delusion involved. Obviously, there are officials and lawyers in the meetings who understand reality and are happy to feed ministerial delusions, as they did with Cameron, May, Boris, and Sunnak. There are odd unusual officials who can bluntly tell the truth. PM, so there is no confusion. What you're announcing cannot possibly do what you claim. I know Sunnak was super delusional not lying only because I spoke to him in person twice. And of course, many politicians develop weird superp position personalities where they sort of know and sort of lie to themselves such that an impartial observer can rarely conclude either they're lying or they're deluded. It's a bit of both. This is Ki Starama to a tea. The man doesn't dream. He has no internal monologue. He outsources all of his decision-making capacities to international law. And so he has convinced himself that these neutral arbitration processes or whatever Tony Blair tells him to do will resolve every contradiction and crisis. it simply isn't the case. And Cummings for once, despite his disastrous impact in various government departments that I know from people who have worked with him, he's correct. And he says it's how many cope when promoted to jobs far beyond them, Sunnak, Stalma, etc. And it's very poorly understood among business elites who always overrate the rationality of political players and underrate the prevalence of this superp position personality phenomenon which means widespread avoidance of the real issues in meeting after meeting to an extent the median business elite has little experience of outside companies heading for bankruptcy and this is why so many rich business people are fleeing. I think we're losing about as many millionaires as communist China is at this point. So, it's not just because of the tax code. It's because they're frustrated by the sclerotic and claude eared decision-making process in government and the government isn't run by a business according to market principles. And so, they're going, well, if I'm not going to be listened to, I'll go somewhere else that is more likely to listen to my advice. And Cummings says, I suspect there's more conscious dishonesty with Star than Sunnak, but the result is sure to be the same. Political disaster. So, our governments are not listening. Other government advisers are saying the same thing. This was a BBC News night appearance by Detective Chief Constable Becky Riggs and she was saying that it's actually not true that the grooming gangs are predominantly comprised of Pakistani Muslim males. Um, it is absolutely true. Even Dr. Ella Cockbane, the Guardian's go-to academic to dispute grooming gang narratives in her own research samples admitted that 80% of the grooming gang perpetrators are Pakistani ethnic males. the majority of them are Muslim Asian demographics. So, you know, not Japanese or Sikhs. And so the what the the government here, the police, the the state broadcast, the BBC are doing, as James Price sums up, he's a former government adviser. He says, "The reason the police say this stuff is that they're terrified of widespread civil conflict based on ethic and religious lines, that they are incapable of suppressing it if it kicks off. So, they merely try to hide the facts under the carpet. And it's disgusting." And look, people that listen to the likes of James, so Robert Gerick, Katy Lamb, Rupert Low, they get this. This is why they're so concerned about the dilitterious imported social practices of Islam. But the other politicians just don't want to touch it. This is why Kama refused to answer Sarah Poachin's questions about the Burka ban, for example. But don't worry, ladies and gentlemen, our top intelligence officials have their priorities order in order. They're definitely on the case. Richard Moore, chief of MI6. To mark Pride Month and to stand in solidarity with our LGBTQ plus colleagues, MI6 is proudly flying the pride flag from Voxil Cross alongside the Union flag for the whole month of June. Your sexual orientation is no bar to you working and thriving at MI6. Britain is seriously cooked. It's not good. And so the only thing we can do is keep raising the salience to the issue until sufficient courageous politicians take notice and act. But we really are running out of time for that. [Music]