🔍

Causal Hypotheses Part 1

May 7, 2025

Evaluating Causal Hypotheses

Introduction

  • Previous lecture discussed the concept of causation:
    • Effect on an individual (deterministic or probabilistic)
    • Effect on a population
  • Difficulty in determining an individual's complete residual state
  • Use of population to determine causal effects

Focus of the Lecture

  • Evaluating causal hypotheses
  • Focus on randomized experimental trials:
    • Considered the gold standard
  • Next lecture: Other experimental designs

Course Announcements

  • Homework for Chapter 7 deadline extended
  • Exam format change:
    • Take-home exam
    • Open book
    • Focus on understanding concepts rather than precise details

Example Study: Randomized Experimental Trial

  • 1977 FDA study on saccharin and rats
  • Study showed saccharin causes cancer in lab rats
  • FDA issued a warning label rather than a ban

Study Details

  • Two-generation rat feeding experiments:
    • Both generations received saccharin
    • Control group did not ingest saccharin
  • Significant evidence found in the second generation
  • First generation results were not statistically significant

Experimental Design

  • Causal variable: Ingestion of saccharin
  • Effect variable: Occurrence of bladder cancer
  • Randomized sampling and division into control and experimental groups

Evaluation of Causal Hypothesis

  • Determining statistical significance:
    • Use of P values
    • Significant if P < 0.05
  • Inference to humans from rat studies
  • Threshold effect considerations

Methodology

  1. Identify real-world population and causal hypothesis
  2. Analyze data
  3. Identify experimental design
  4. Evaluate random sampling
  5. Evaluate hypothesis
  6. Provide summary

Considerations for Human Application

  • Large doses of saccharin used in rats
  • Human equivalent: 800 bottles of soda per day
  • Risk assessment and public policy implications

Double-Blind Trials

  • Ensures only systematic difference is the causal variable
  • Placebo effect and psychological impacts
  • Double-blind: Neither subjects nor experimenters know group assignments

Conclusion

  • Importance of randomized experimental trials in evaluating causal hypotheses
  • Homework and office hour reminders