Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
Forensic Science Evolution and Impact
Oct 28, 2024
Lecture Notes: Crime and Modern Science in Forensic Analysis
Introduction to Forensic Science and DNA Testing
Evolution of DNA Testing
Introduced in the late 1980s.
Brought scientific certainty to courtrooms.
Convicted the guilty and freed the innocent.
Questioned the reliability of previous forensic methods.
Microscopic Hair Analysis
Historical Context
Relied upon by the criminal justice system before DNA testing.
Used to match hairs from crime scenes to suspects.
Case Study: Kirk Odum
Arrested due to hair match despite an alibi.
Convicted in 1981 based on microscopic hair analysis.
Sentenced to over 20 years in prison.
Transition to DNA Testing
Introduction of DNA Technology
Emerged in the mid-1990s.
Enabled more precise hair analysis.
Challenges of Hair Analysis
Early DNA comparisons showed discrepancies.
About 11% of hairs thought to match microscopically did not match DNA.
Impact of DNA Testing on Historical Cases
Reevaluation of Old Cases
The Innocence Project leveraged DNA to free wrongly convicted prisoners.
By 2012, DNA exonerated many convicted partly by hair analysis.
Limitations of Hair Analysis
Lack of Statistical Foundation
No statistical backing for matching hairs unlike DNA.
Misleading courtroom claims by forensic experts led to wrongful convictions.
Reevaluation and Exoneration
High-Profile Exonerations
Investigations revealed flawed testimonies in FBI hair analysis cases.
Exonerations highlighted in a Washington Post investigation.
Kirk Odum and others were exonerated after serving long sentences.
FBI and Innocence Project Collaboration
Review of Historical Cases
Reviewing over 2,500 pre-DNA testing cases.
Anticipation of finding many scientifically invalid testimonies.
Consequences
Dozens on death row; potential for wrongful convictions.
Some real perpetrators committed additional crimes.
Conclusion
Importance of Scientific Accuracy
Necessity for the criminal justice system to rely on accurate scientific methods.
Aim to prevent future wrongful convictions and promote justice.
📄
Full transcript