Forensic Science Evolution and Impact

Oct 28, 2024

Lecture Notes: Crime and Modern Science in Forensic Analysis

Introduction to Forensic Science and DNA Testing

  • Evolution of DNA Testing
    • Introduced in the late 1980s.
    • Brought scientific certainty to courtrooms.
    • Convicted the guilty and freed the innocent.
    • Questioned the reliability of previous forensic methods.

Microscopic Hair Analysis

  • Historical Context
    • Relied upon by the criminal justice system before DNA testing.
    • Used to match hairs from crime scenes to suspects.
  • Case Study: Kirk Odum
    • Arrested due to hair match despite an alibi.
    • Convicted in 1981 based on microscopic hair analysis.
    • Sentenced to over 20 years in prison.

Transition to DNA Testing

  • Introduction of DNA Technology
    • Emerged in the mid-1990s.
    • Enabled more precise hair analysis.
  • Challenges of Hair Analysis
    • Early DNA comparisons showed discrepancies.
    • About 11% of hairs thought to match microscopically did not match DNA.

Impact of DNA Testing on Historical Cases

  • Reevaluation of Old Cases
    • The Innocence Project leveraged DNA to free wrongly convicted prisoners.
    • By 2012, DNA exonerated many convicted partly by hair analysis.

Limitations of Hair Analysis

  • Lack of Statistical Foundation
    • No statistical backing for matching hairs unlike DNA.
    • Misleading courtroom claims by forensic experts led to wrongful convictions.

Reevaluation and Exoneration

  • High-Profile Exonerations
    • Investigations revealed flawed testimonies in FBI hair analysis cases.
    • Exonerations highlighted in a Washington Post investigation.
    • Kirk Odum and others were exonerated after serving long sentences.

FBI and Innocence Project Collaboration

  • Review of Historical Cases
    • Reviewing over 2,500 pre-DNA testing cases.
    • Anticipation of finding many scientifically invalid testimonies.
  • Consequences
    • Dozens on death row; potential for wrongful convictions.
    • Some real perpetrators committed additional crimes.

Conclusion

  • Importance of Scientific Accuracy
    • Necessity for the criminal justice system to rely on accurate scientific methods.
    • Aim to prevent future wrongful convictions and promote justice.