SA505 External Confirmation Revision Insights

Aug 7, 2024

Notes on SA505 External Confirmation Revision Session


Introduction

  • Welcome to the revision session of SA505 External Confirmation.
  • External Confirmation is an audit evidence received as a direct written response from a third party to the auditor.

Definition

  • External Confirmation: Audit evidence obtained directly from a third party without any intermediary involvement.
    • Can be in paper or electronic form.

External Confirmation Procedures

  1. Decide What to Know: Determine what information is needed from the third party.
  2. Select Appropriate Conforming Party: Choose the right party to obtain information from.
  3. Design the Confirmation Request:
    • Address to the appropriate manager (e.g., the manager of HDFC Bank).
    • Include auditor's address for response.
  4. Send the Request: Follow up if there is no response.

Factors to Consider When Designing Confirmation Requests

  • Layout and Presentation: Ensure clarity and professionalism.
  • Assertions Addressed: Identify key assertions that need confirmation.
  • Prior Experience: Consider previous experiences and the risk of material misstatement (ROMAM).
  • Authorization: Ensure management's authorization for confirmations.
  • Method of Communication: Determine how requests will be sent.
  • Ability of Conforming Party: Assess whether the third party can provide the required information.

Types of Confirmation Requests

  • Positive Confirmation Request (PCR):
    • Requires a reply from the conforming party in all cases (agree/disagree/no information).
    • Provides reliable audit evidence but may risk unverified responses.
  • Negative Confirmation Request (NCR):
    • Requires a reply only if the conforming party disagrees with the information.
    • Less persuasive evidence due to potential non-responses; does not confirm agreement or verification.
    • Four conditions must be met for use:
      1. ROMAM is assessed as low.
      2. Low exception rate.
      3. Homogeneous balances.
      4. No indication that the conforming party will disregard the request.

Risks and Considerations

  • Risks of material misstatement due to fraud should be evaluated.
  • If management refuses to send requests, evidence should be gathered to understand the reason.
  • Consider nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures based on findings.

Alternate Procedures

  • If primary confirmation procedures are not possible or responses are unreliable, alternate procedures must be conducted, such as:
    • Checking shipping documents and invoices for debtors.
    • Reviewing subsequent cash receipts.
    • Examining legal documents for disputes.

Communication of Findings

  • If material misstatements are suspected, report to TCWG (SA-260) and consider implications (SA-705).

Conclusion

  • Review of SA330 (deciding to send confirmations) and SA505 (procedures for sending confirmations).
  • Confirm balances with debtors, creditors, and other relevant parties.
  • Understand that external confirmations provide important audit evidence but require careful consideration of risks and reliability.

Final Thoughts

  • Emphasize the importance of careful planning and execution in the audit process.
  • Maintain a positive attitude and stay engaged in the learning process.