Understanding Clinical Reasoning Systems

Oct 2, 2024

Clinical Reasoning: Thinking Fast and Slow

Introduction

  • Clinical reasoning involves several component skills.
  • Focus on "thinking fast and slow" or "system one and system two."

System One: Fast Thinking

  • Characteristics:
    • Relies on intuition and previous experiences.
    • Typically involuntary and uses heuristics (as per Daniel Kahneman).
    • Beneficial for daily activities but can lead to errors if over-relied upon.
  • Role in Clinical Reasoning:
    • Experienced clinicians build capacity through experience and pattern recognition.
    • Use scripts to chunk information and recognize patterns efficiently.
    • Reliance on system one until a situation doesn't fit a known pattern, triggering system two.

System Two: Slow Thinking

  • Characteristics:
    • Slow, effortful, and conscious.
    • Better for complex, unfamiliar situations.
    • Considered more reliable than system one.
  • Role in Clinical Reasoning:
    • Novice clinicians depend more on system two due to lack of experience.
    • Over time, they transition to more system one thinking but with frequent shifts back to system two.

Common Biases in Clinical Reasoning

  • Availability Bias:
    • Prioritizing first thoughts based on limited experiences.
    • Mitigation through research and expert guidance.
  • Recency Bias:
    • Giving more weight to recent events, e.g., over-palpating after detecting an anomaly.
  • Confirmation Bias:
    • Selectively gathering information to support preconceived conclusions.
  • Premature Closure:
    • Ending decision-making prematurely, analogous to the "blind villagers" parable.

Managing Bias and Shifting Between Systems

  • Awareness and Education:
    • Recognize and educate oneself on biases to avoid traps.
  • Planned Bias Checkpoints:
    • Implement systematic reflection and checkpoints to control biases.
  • Reflection in Action:
    • Pause post-interview to consider unthought-of alternatives.
  • Reflection on Action:
    • Reflect post-case to improve system one for future scenarios.

Conclusion

  • Both systems one and two drive effective clinical reasoning.
  • Experts mostly use system one but shift to system two when necessary.
  • Systematic bias control enhances the ability to transition between systems, improving clinical reasoning.