Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
⚖️
Engel v. Vitale: Church and State Separation
Apr 16, 2025
Heimlich's History: Engel v. Vitale Supreme Court Case
Introduction
Explores the landmark Supreme Court case: Engel v. Vitale (1962).
Focus on the separation of church and state.
Facts of the Case
The case was presented to the Supreme Court in 1962.
New York Board of Regents composed a non-denominational prayer recited by school children after the Pledge of Allegiance.
The prayer: "Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our country."
Children could opt out with written parental permission.
Stephen Engel and a group of parents challenged this practice.
Constitutional Principle
First Amendment's Establishment Clause:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
Challenge: Although a state law, the 14th Amendment applies the First Amendment to states, preventing states from establishing a religion.
Core issue: Establishment clause of the First Amendment.
Supreme Court Decision
Question: Does a state-sponsored prayer in school violate the Establishment Clause?
Decision: 6-1, prayer violated the First Amendment.
Majority Opinion by Justice Hugo Black:
First Amendment ensures federal government does not control or influence prayer.
Dissent by Justice Potter Stewart:
Argued school prayer was constitutional as it offered spiritual participation without establishing a religion.
Referenced Jefferson’s "wall of separation between church and state."
Significance of the Case
Individual Liberties:
Engel v. Vitale favored individual liberties over social order.
Precedent for Future Cases:
Cited in subsequent cases regarding school and religious activities.
Notably cited in Wallace v. Jaffree (1985) against school prayer and in cases against clergy-led prayers at school events.
Impact:
Influential in shaping the relationship between government and religion in later decades.
Conclusion
Engel v. Vitale remains a critical case in the context of U.S. constitutional law and civil liberties.
Heimlich's resources provide further assistance for students studying American government and Supreme Court cases.
📄
Full transcript