Exploring Absolute Moral Rules and Dilemmas

Sep 30, 2024

Lecture Notes on The Elements of Moral Philosophy, Chapter 9

Introduction

  • Topic: Are there absolute moral rules?
    • Defined as universal rules that apply in all circumstances.
    • Question posed: Are there rules that everyone must follow to be moral?

Section 1: Harry S. Truman and the Atomic Bombings

  • Historical Context: Truman authorized the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945.
    • Intention: End World War II quickly, potentially saving more lives.
    • Ethical Dilemma: Involvement of killing innocents and non-combatants.
  • Philosophical Opposition: Elizabeth Anscombe
    • Against Truman’s decision; labeled it as murder.
    • Believed that intentionally killing innocents is always wrong.

Section 2: Immanuel Kant and Absolute Moral Rules

  • Kant’s Philosophy:
    • Moral Rules: Absolute and universal.
    • Categorical Imperative: Actions must be universally applicable.
    • Rejects lying in any circumstance.
  • Hypothetical vs. Categorical Imperatives:
    • Hypothetical: Actions taken based on desires.
    • Categorical: Actions required regardless of desires due to reason.
  • Example: False promises for loans are inherently self-defeating if universalized.
  • Criticism:
    • Not all lies are self-defeating; example of lying to save lives.
    • Failures in Kant's philosophy: Some lies are harmless (white lies), suggesting flaws in absolute rules.

Section 3: Conflicts Between Rules

  • Moral Dilemma: Choosing between two wrongs.
  • Example: WWII Dutch fishermen smuggling Jews, faced with lying or facilitating murder.
    • Peter Gitch: Denied such conflicts, relying on divine providence.
    • Reality shows conflicts do occur; absolute prohibitions are incoherent.
  • Theoretical Limitations:
    • Requires pairs of absolute moral rules to create conflict.
    • Simplistic rule "Do what is right" holds limited practical value.

Section 4: Kant’s Insights

  • Rationality and Morality:
    • Categorical imperative binds rational agents due to their rationality.
    • Rejection of such principles indicates irrationality and immorality.
  • Universality in Moral Law:
    • Reasons for actions should apply universally.
    • Consistency required across similar circumstances.
  • Application:
    • Dutch fishermen: Universal acceptance of lying to save lives.
  • President Truman’s Options:
    • Alternatives to bombing: Demonstrative bombing in unpopulated areas or halting the war.

Conclusion

  • Reflection: Consideration of moral absolutes and their real-world application.
  • Further Discussion: Potential options and moral choices in historical context.