Cultural Sensitivity in Suicide Prevention

Oct 26, 2024

SPINZ National Symposium 2009: Culture and Suicide Prevention in Aotearoa

Speaker: Dr. Tracy Westerman - Indigenous Best Practice

Importance of Evaluation

  • Cultural Bound Phenomena
    • Addressed skepticism about the existence of cultural illnesses.
    • Highlighted that mainstream perspectives lack exposure to cultural phenomena, thus can't relate or recognize them.
    • Emphasized the need for research and documentation in scientific journals to force acknowledgment by mainstream psychology.

Limitations in Mainstream Assessment for Indigenous Populations

  • Examples of Misunderstandings
    • Aboriginal spiritual experiences (e.g., seeing spirits) marked as potential psychosis.
    • Cultural grieving practices, such as 'sorry cuts', misinterpreted as self-harm in mental health evaluations.
    • Highlighted the need for culturally sensitive assessment tools.

Bridging Cultural and Clinical Training

  • Language as a Barrier
    • Aboriginal cultural workers marginalized in clinical settings due to lack of clinical terminology.
    • Clinicians marginalized in cultural settings due to lack of cultural terminology.
  • Training Focus
    • Teaching a dual language approach to bridge cultural and clinical worlds.
    • Training involves explaining clinical and cultural terms simultaneously for mutual understanding.

Community Action: The Derby Example

  • Community-Driven Initiatives
    • Response to high suicide rates in Derby through community training initiatives.
    • Government funding secured to develop three training packages for service providers, community, and youth.
    • Package Focus:
      • Service Providers: Enhancing work with Aboriginal people, counseling, and suicide intervention.
      • Community: Recognizing signs, coping strategies, and effective communication.
      • Youth: Psycho-educative content.
    • Involvement of the whole community in training ensures common understanding and action strategies.

Outcomes and Success

  • Community engagement led to significant involvement (e.g., 117 participants over six days).
  • Three-phase program following up over 18 months.
  • Empowerment of community to independently run programs.
  • Success led to nationwide delivery of programs.

Additional Information