Transcript for:
Exploring Australia's Federalism and Framework

According to James Madison, one of the founding  fathers of the North American Federation,   there are at least five ways that we can identify  a Federal Constitution. For Madison, we ought to   consider when analyzing a federal constitution  the formation process the representation in   government institutions the configuration  of powers the operation of federal laws   and the process to amend the constitution. So,  if we were to take these five aspects, how are we   to qualify the Australian Federation how would  Australia fit in each one of these aspects?   Hello everyone my name is Renato Costa   this is Aussie Law and today we will  learn a bit more about the Federal System   in Australia. If you don't want to miss any of  our videos about the Australian Federation and the   Australian Constitution, I invite you to subscribe  to our channel and click the bell sign because   then every time I upload a new video you'll  be notified and you're not going to miss out! So, welcome to another part of a series of videos  that we are doing about Federalism in Australia.   If you haven't checked our previous videos, I  would invite you to do that by clicking on the   top right corner but if you have you already know  that we already discussed some things about the   Australian Federation like federalism being about  self-rule and shared rule. Self-rule concerns the   states continuing to exercise autonomous powers  of self-government and shared rule is about the   states participating in the governing of  the whole of Australia. So we know that   let's now move on to these five aspects that  Madison highlighted. The first aspect is the   formation of a federal system we have already  seen a lot and I've talked a lot about that   we know that Australia was an aggregation it was  through an aggregative movement of the colonies   uniting into one Federal Commonwealth. The second  aspect relates to the governing institutions of   the states and of the Commonwealth. I have already  explained the branches of government and their   governing institutions in the video entitled  "Australian Federalism Explained". I said there   that both levels of government the states and  the Commonwealth they have a similar structure   concerning the branches of power the Executive,  the Legislature and the Judiciary. If you want   more details about that go there and click on  the video that is appearing in the card above.   Now, the other three points, I think, deserve  closer attention. The third aspect of a federal   constitution is the configuration of  powers it means the manner in which   governmental powers are located between the  two levels of government. I've hinted about   this distribution of powers in other videos but  right now I want you to open the Constitution,   Chapter 1, Section 51, and check the list that  is appearing there. Do you see there is a list   of legislative powers of the Federal Parliament  there? It includes trade and commerce, taxation,   postal and telephonic services ,quarantine,  census and statistics, currency and coinage,   naturalization and aliens, that's me the alien,  marriage, external affairs... there's a bunch   of stuff there. And if you move to section 52,  you will also find what are called the exclusive   powers of Parliament and there is another list of  things that Parliament, the Federal Parliament can   legislate about. But we don't find here in the  Australian Constitution a list of legislative   powers that were given to the States, because the  idea of the framers of the Australian Constitution   was that anything that wasn't given in the list  there for the Federal Parliament would belong to   the states; was reserved to be legislated by the  states. This is known as the "doctrine of reserved   states powers" it is also a doctrine that comes  from the interpretation primarily of section   106 in 107 of the Australian Constitution. The  idea of the doctrine of reserved powers was that   we should interpret the powers that were given  to the Commonwealth, to the Federal Parliament   in a manner that would preserve the powers that  were reserved to the States. So the States have   residual powers. The powers that are not listed to  the Commonwealth belong to the States. Hence the   name doctrine of "reserved powers". This doctrine  has actually changed and we will explain that   later on when we make a video about the Engineer's  case. If you don't want to miss that video make   sure that you click the bell sign and subscribe  to our channel. In the Federal Constitution   there is an allocation and distribution of power  between the States and the Federal Commonwealth.   So this is the configuration of power in the  Australian Federation: there are powers that   are expressly given to the Federal Commonwealth,  even some exclusive powers, and the remainder   of those powers, all the powers that are not  listed in section 51 and 52 of the Constitution,   they belong, they were reserved, to the States.  Now let's move forward to the fourth aspect. It's   about the operation of federal law. This kind of  falls into the explanation of the third aspect   but with one distinctiveness because this fourth  aspect deals with the capacity of the federal law   to directly interfere and regulate the life of  an individual. So here I want to briefly discuss   section 109 of the Australian Constitution. We  saw when we were discussing aspect number three   that the Federal Commonwealth could still  legislate about matters that will directly   affect the life of an individual. That's fine.  And those matters are set out in section 51 of   the Australian Constitution. But the thing that I  wanted to focus here is what happens if the State   and the Commonwealth they both legislate but their  legislation, their laws conflict with one another.   What happens if there is a contradiction of law  between the States and the Commonwealth? What   law will prevail? What law will be followed by the  individual? The federal or the state's? According   to section 109, when a law of the State conflicts  and is inconsistent with the law of the Federal   Commonwealth, it is the law of the Commonwealth  that will prevail and the law of the State to   the extent of its inconsistency will be invalid  this section is a very important section and it   deserves a video of its own. I will record that  later on but now I just want you to know this:   if there is an inconsistency between the State  law and a Commonwealth law it is the Commonwealth   law that will prevail and the Commonwealth laws  will trump the State laws to the extent of their   inconsistency with the Commonwealth laws so what  about the fourth aspect and the operation of the   federal law that can directly affect an individual  we can see that not only in section 51 of the   Constitution where there is a list of matters  that the Federal Parliament can legislate about   but also in section 109 when State laws are  inconsistent with the Federal Commonwealth,   with federal laws, and to the extent of the  inconsistency, it is the Commonwealth law,   the federal law, that will prevail and be applied  in that situation and directly to that person.   And, finally, let's move to the fifth aspect the  amendment process. I've already talked about it   as well and you can check what I said in the video  about the differences between the states and the   territories. And I also promised to make a video  specifically about section 128 of the Australian   Constitution that deals with the amendment to  the Constitution but what is relevant to us now   is that the States do participate in the process  of amending the Australian Constitution. According   to section 128 of the Australian Constitution,  to amend it we need not only to count the votes   of the whole of the people of Australia but also  to count the votes of the people of the States.   This tells us that there is not only a national  or a federal approach in initiative to change the   Constitution but that the States do participate  they actively and directly participate in the   amendment process so this is already one thing  that is a mark of the Australian Federal System   but there is yet another thing the Senate also  participates in the process and as we have seen   the Senate is the "house of the States". So, to  alter the Australian Constitution, we need not   only the participation of the States to count  in the referendum as a majority of the people   of the States but also in the Senate through the  representatives of the States, the senators. So   the fifth aspect is completed by the fact that the  States do participate in the amendment process. So   there you have it the Madisonian five aspects  of a Federal constitution applied to Australia. Thank you so much for watching this video! I  hope you enjoyed it, don't forget to like it,   to subscribe, and also hit the bell sign. And,  of course, share this with everyone you think may   profit, may benefit from this video. I hope  to see you next time. Until then, tchau!