Lecture Notes: Why Nepal and Bhutan Were Never Annexed by Major Powers
Context and Background
- Geographical Position: Nepal and Bhutan are located between two major powers: China and India.
- Historical Examples: Unlike Poland and Armenia, which were partitioned by neighboring powers, Nepal and Bhutan maintained their independence.
Historical Context
The Mughal Empire
- The Mughal Empire was an expansionist state but had internal issues and larger enemies to deal with.
- The Empire collapsed, leading to a divided India, much of which fell under the Maratha Empire.
British Influence
- The British, lacking manpower, ruled through local rulers who stayed in power by swearing loyalty to Britain or the East India Company.
- Nepal's expansion brought it into conflict with Britain.
- Resulted in a war where Britain emerged victorious.
- Nepal retained independence and received British protection by allowing trade access.
The Case of Bhutan
- Initial confusion by the British about Bhutan's territorial status relative to China.
- British invasion led to the acquisition of Darjeeling but not Bhutan due to its challenging geography and limited benefit.
- Bhutan became a buffer state in the British sphere of influence.
Relations with China
-
Nepal:
- Viewed as an extension of Tibet by China.
- Initially paid tribute to China following conflict.
- Geography and British influence deterred Chinese annexation.
-
Bhutan:
- Similar geographic difficulties and benefits as Nepal.
- Close relations with Tibet provided a deterrence.
- British influence further complicated Chinese ambitions.
Post-Colonial Developments
- After British withdrawal, Nepal and Bhutan remained independent, unlike Sikkim.
- Sikkim, once a British protectorate, became part of India in the 1970s.
Chinese Communist Era
- Mao Zedong claimed the Himalayan States as part of Tibet.
- No actions were taken by China post-British era to annex Nepal or Bhutan.
Conclusion
- Geographical challenges, historical circumstances, and diplomatic maneuvers contributed to Nepal and Bhutan's continued independence.
Additional Notes:
- Buffer states and strategic importance played a crucial role in the politics of the region.
- The diplomatic relations and treaties with major powers ensured the semi-autonomy of these smaller states.
Credits to Patrons for supporting insights on the topic.