Dr. John Gottman: Making Marriage Work

Introduction

• Speaker: Dr. John Gottman
• Expertise: Research on relationships, over 3,000 couples studied over 32 years
• Collaboration with Bob Levinson, University of California Berkeley
• Goal: Understanding what makes relationships work

Methodology

• Videotaped couples discussing daily life and conflicts
• Built an apartment laboratory for 24-hour observations
• Collected physiological data (e.g., electrocardiogram, stress hormones)
• Studied a diverse range of couples (newlyweds to retirees)

Key Findings

Predictability of Relationship Outcomes

• Could predict with over 90% accuracy which couples would divorce or stay together
• Short-term prediction (15 minutes): 85% accuracy
• Long-term prediction (14 years): accuracy on when divorce would happen

Positive vs. Negative Interactions

• Successful couples (masters): 5:1 ratio of positive to negative interactions during conflict
  • Daily life (non-conflict): 20:1 ratio
• Unsuccessful couples (disasters): 0.8:1 ratio, more negative than positive
• Negativity can be productive for highlighting issues to be fixed

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

1. **Criticism: attacks partner’s character (e.g., “What is wrong with you?”)
   • Alternative: Complain about specific behaviors (e.g., “It hurt my feelings when...”)
2. **Defensiveness: warding off attacks
   • Righteous indignation
   • Acting like an innocent victim (whining)
   • Alternative: Accept responsibility in part (e.g., “Good point, I was stressed.”)
3. **Contempt: feeling superior, best predictor of divorce
   • Alternative: Respect and appreciation, create a culture of appreciation
4. **Stonewalling: emotional withdrawal from interaction
   • Alternative: Engage, keep up nonverbal signals (eye contact, nodding)

Enhancing Friendship in Relationships

Love Maps

• Knowing partner’s inner world (stresses, dreams, values)
• Asking open-ended questions

Fondness and Admiration

• Regularly expressing appreciation and affection
• Saying “thank you” for small acts

Turning Toward

• Responding to bids for attention/connection
• Emotional bank account: building points in a relationship through positive interactions

Positive vs. Negative Sentiment Override

• Positive: positive sentiment buffers against irritability
• Negative: leads to hypersensitivity to partner’s actions

Handling Conflict

• Repair Attempts: Recovering from arguments with apologies and discussions
• Sense of Humor: Ability to laugh during conflicts improves relationship

Perpetual vs. Solvable Problems

• 69% of conflicts are perpetual; unlikely to be solved
• Masters have a “dialogue” with these issues

Moving from Gridlock to Dialogue

• Identifying life dreams within conflicts
• Releasing dreams and honoring both partners’ dreams for resolution

Gentle Startups and Influence

• Start discussions gently to avoid escalation
• Accepting influence, particularly men accepting influence from women
• Compromise requires physiological calm (below 100 bpm heart rate)

Creating Shared Meaning

• Building a shared sense of mission and legacy
• Engaging in rituals, roles, and tasks that support a shared vision

Conclusion

• Focus on quality of friendship: Love maps, fondness/admiration, turning toward
• Conflict regulation through repair and humor
• Use perpetual problems to deepen intimacy by addressing underlying dreams
• Build a shared meaning system for a fulfilling relationship

Final Thoughts

• Relationships thrive on understanding, appreciation, and intentional actions to support each other
• Techniques are research-backed and proven effective over 32 years of study

---

• Visit Better Life Media for further resources