Lecture Notes: Salomon Ash and Stanley Milgram Experiments
Overview
This lecture covers two major social psychology experiments:
- Salomon Ash Conformity Test
- Stanley Milgram's Behavioral Study on Obedience
Salomon Ash Conformity Test
- Published: 1955 in Scientific American.
- Objective: To investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform.
- Experiment Setup:
- Participants asked to match line lengths.
- Group members deliberately gave wrong answers.
- Key finding: 36.8% of participants conformed to incorrect group judgment.
- Conclusions and Questions Raised:
- Investigated the consistency of conformity.
- Examined relationship between independence in behavior and character traits.
- Questions related to sociological and cultural influences on conformity.
- Concerned with education and values guiding conduct.
Transition to Milgram's Study
- Ash’s conclusions inspired further exploration into obedience, leading to Milgram’s study.
- Emphasized that society requires consensus but should not be dominated by conformity.
Stanley Milgram's Behavioral Study on Obedience
- Published: 1963.
- Objective: To investigate willingness to obey authority figures in conflicting situations.
- Context: Post-WWII interest in understanding obedience to authority (e.g., Nazi regime).
Experimental Design
- Participants: 40 males aged 20-50 from various occupational backgrounds.
- Setting: Conducted at Yale University, lending credibility.
- Procedure:
- Participants assigned role of "teacher" and instructed to administer electric shocks to "learner".
- Shocks increased in intensity with wrong answers.
- Key Variable: Experimenter in lab coat reinforcing continuation.
Findings
- Majority (26 out of 40) administered maximum shock level (450 volts).
- Participants showed signs of severe stress and anxiety.
- Raised ethical concerns about authority and obedience.
Conclusion and Impact
- Highlighted tension between obedience and moral actions.
- Emphasized need for ethical guidelines in psychological research.
- Informed the development of Institutional Review Boards and informed consent processes.
Discussion Points
- Obedience: Seen as necessary for societal functioning but can lead to destructive outcomes if unchecked.
- Ethical Considerations: Today, such experiments would be subject to strict ethical scrutiny.
- Legacy: Continues to inform discussions on obedience and authority in psychology.
Closing
- The Ash and Milgram experiments provide insights into human behavior and societal dynamics.
- Prompt reflection on moral responsibility and ethical research practices.
- For further questions and discussion, reach out to the lecturer.