🧠

Exploring Conformity and Obedience in Psychology

Feb 25, 2025

Lecture Notes: Salomon Ash and Stanley Milgram Experiments

Overview

This lecture covers two major social psychology experiments:

  1. Salomon Ash Conformity Test
  2. Stanley Milgram's Behavioral Study on Obedience

Salomon Ash Conformity Test

  • Published: 1955 in Scientific American.
  • Objective: To investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform.
  • Experiment Setup:
    • Participants asked to match line lengths.
    • Group members deliberately gave wrong answers.
    • Key finding: 36.8% of participants conformed to incorrect group judgment.
  • Conclusions and Questions Raised:
    • Investigated the consistency of conformity.
    • Examined relationship between independence in behavior and character traits.
    • Questions related to sociological and cultural influences on conformity.
    • Concerned with education and values guiding conduct.

Transition to Milgram's Study

  • Ash’s conclusions inspired further exploration into obedience, leading to Milgram’s study.
  • Emphasized that society requires consensus but should not be dominated by conformity.

Stanley Milgram's Behavioral Study on Obedience

  • Published: 1963.
  • Objective: To investigate willingness to obey authority figures in conflicting situations.
  • Context: Post-WWII interest in understanding obedience to authority (e.g., Nazi regime).

Experimental Design

  • Participants: 40 males aged 20-50 from various occupational backgrounds.
  • Setting: Conducted at Yale University, lending credibility.
  • Procedure:
    • Participants assigned role of "teacher" and instructed to administer electric shocks to "learner".
    • Shocks increased in intensity with wrong answers.
    • Key Variable: Experimenter in lab coat reinforcing continuation.

Findings

  • Majority (26 out of 40) administered maximum shock level (450 volts).
  • Participants showed signs of severe stress and anxiety.
  • Raised ethical concerns about authority and obedience.

Conclusion and Impact

  • Highlighted tension between obedience and moral actions.
  • Emphasized need for ethical guidelines in psychological research.
  • Informed the development of Institutional Review Boards and informed consent processes.

Discussion Points

  • Obedience: Seen as necessary for societal functioning but can lead to destructive outcomes if unchecked.
  • Ethical Considerations: Today, such experiments would be subject to strict ethical scrutiny.
  • Legacy: Continues to inform discussions on obedience and authority in psychology.

Closing

  • The Ash and Milgram experiments provide insights into human behavior and societal dynamics.
  • Prompt reflection on moral responsibility and ethical research practices.
  • For further questions and discussion, reach out to the lecturer.