⚠️

HDR Source Safety and Acceptance Procedures

Oct 7, 2024

HDR Source Acceptance and Safety Procedures

Introduction

  • Speaker: Kevin Kennedy, Medical Physicist at Austin Cancer Centers
  • Topic: Acceptance of HDR (High Dose Rate) source for electron micro solectron
  • Context: Austin Cancer Centers with active brachytherapy programs
    • Includes LDR prostate siting and HDR for GYN, skin, breast

HDR Source Workflow

  1. Production:
    • Iridium 191 bombarded with neutrons in a reactor to produce Iridium 192
    • Transported to the destination under government agency supervision
  2. Usage Duration:
    • Typically used for 3 months, decays from 11-12 curie to 4-5 curie
  3. Return Process:
    • Spent source returned through proper channels
  4. Safety and Regulations:
    • Refer to IAEA safety standards via provided link

Source Acceptance Process

Preparation

  • Notification:
    • Email from the vendor (reciprocity request) indicating incoming source
    • Expected arrival date is specified
  • Source Reception:
    • Verify shipping declaration
    • Measure transport index (dose rate at 1 meter)
  • Source Exchange:
    • Service engineer replaces old source, performs safety checks
    • Physics department reviews and conducts additional tests

Return and Documentation

  • Return Process:
    • Spent source sent back to the vendor with documentation
  • Compliance:
    • Follow Task Group 56 and 59 guidelines
    • International colleagues should refer to local guidelines

Testing and Validation

Source Verification

  • Ensure Correct Source:
    • Confirm Iridium 192 received, not Iodine 125
  • Dual Position Accuracy Test:
    • Ensures source travels precisely to designated points
    • Tolerance within 1mm

Dwell Time Accuracy

  • Test Procedure:
    • Check if dwell time is accurate within ±1 second
    • Highly reliable with digital systems

Source Strength Measurement

  • Activity Measurement:
    • Ensure measurements align with vendor certificates
    • Typically within 1% of reported values
  • Use of Air Kerma Strength:
    • Move towards specifying source strength in air kerma rather than curie

System Checks and Daily QA

  • Daily Checks:
    • Source position accuracy and interrupt button functionality
    • Use of homemade film strips for cost-effective testing
  • Thermal Equilibrium:
    • Ensure housing ventilation to maintain positional accuracy

Cross-Calibration and Measurements

  • Equipment Calibration:
    • Well chambers and electrometers calibrated biennially
    • Survey meters calibrated annually

Excel Spreadsheet and Documentation

  • Data Entry and Analysis:
    • Enter data in colored cells
    • Cross-check source activity, temperature, and pressure

Conclusion

  • Q&A and Further Discussion:
    • Addressed discrepancies and methods for different systems
    • Encouragement for feedback and follow-up via email

Key Takeaways

  • Adherence to safety and accuracy standards is crucial
  • Regular calibration and system checks ensure reliability
  • Open communication with vendors and colleagues helps resolve discrepancies