Crime Perceptions vs. Reality: Lecture Notes

Jul 12, 2024

Crime Perceptions vs. Reality

Key Findings from Research & Interviews

  • Interviews conducted in fall 2022 in several cities: New York, Seattle, Chicago, Philadelphia.
  • Main concern: Fear of crime in downtown business districts.

Conflicting Crime Data

  • News reports paint a contradictory picture of crime trends.
    • Some report crime is down; others claim it's like a warzone.
    • Two-thirds of Americans believe crime in the US is a very serious problem.
    • Three-quarters think there's more crime than a year ago.

Sources of Crime Data

  • FBI Crime Database: Voluntary reports from law enforcement.
  • National Crime Victimization Survey: Asks people directly if they’ve been victims of crime.
    • Both sources have limitations.

Crime Trends

  • Homicide Data: Spikes in 2020, but looks temporary and is now falling.
    • Still higher than before the pandemic but decreasing.
  • Violent Crime & Property Crime Rates: Overall, both are decreasing.
    • Despite data, 77% believe crime is increasing.

Public Perception vs. Reality

  • Gallup Polls (35 years): Majority always think crime is up from last year.
    • Consistent fear about crime exists despite actual decline over decades.
  • Local vs. National Perception: Majority feel safe locally while believing national crime is out of control.

Specific Research Findings by Hanna Love

  • Fear of violent crime downtown doesn’t match actual data.
    • Example: Chicago's gun deaths concentrated in specific disadvantaged neighborhoods, not downtown.
    • New York: Violent crime up 2% downtown vs. 8% elsewhere.
  • Mismatch in Perception: People believe downtowns are more dangerous than they actually are.

Reasons for Misperception

  • Media Coverage: Frequently highlights crime in populated areas.
    • Media focuses on high-profile downtown incidents over more frequent, localized crimes.
  • Visible Homelessness & Vulnerable People: Pandemic changed who is seen on streets (e.g., fewer office workers, more homelessness).
    • Vulnerable populations wrongly equated with increased crime.

Policy Implications

  • Perception-Based Policies: Examples include sending the National Guard to patrol NYC subway despite declining crime rates.
    • Such policies can misallocate resources and fail to address real issues.
  • Counterproductive Measures: Increasing penalties for petty crimes, drug test requirements for welfare—starting a resurgence of tough-on-crime approaches.

The Challenges and Consequences

  • Perceptions Drive Policy: A big issue because policy influenced by perception rather than data can be ineffective.
    • Trust issues: Voters more likely to trust leaders emphasizing tough-on-crime stances.
    • Difficulty in changing public perception even with declining crime rates.