Id and Superego: Freedom and Destruction in Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner
Introduction
Thesis: The complex relationship between Amir and Hassan in The Kite Runner illustrates the tension between love, guilt, and social class through the lens of the id and superego.
Kite Symbolism: Represents both freedom/love and guilt/destruction.
Main Argument: The novel shows the perpetual conflict between primal desires (id) and societal expectations (superego), emphasizing the impact of repressed trauma.
Amir’s Psychological Conflict
Id vs Superego: Amir’s id seeks Baba's love, while his superego imposes societal and moral expectations.
Kite as a Metaphor:
Connection to Baba: Kite-fighting symbolizes Amir’s attempt to gain Baba’s love.
Fragility: Amir’s relationship with Baba is a "paper-thin" connection.
Outcome: Momentary validation leads to deeper guilt.
Oedipus Complex
Family Dynamics:
Three-way Relationship: Amir, Baba, and Hassan reflect an unconventional Oedipus complex.
Hassan as a Rival: Amir’s id envies Hassan for receiving Baba’s love.
Freud’s Theory: Amir's conflict mirrors the classic Oedipal struggle but is complicated by his lack of a mother.
Societal Expectations
Impact on Relationships:
Amir and Hassan: Loyalty conflicts with societal norms (Pashtun vs Hazara).
Superego Victory: Amir abandons loyalty to conform to societal expectations.