Defense Arguments in Godejohn's Case

Oct 22, 2024

Lecture Notes: Nicholas Godejohn's Case Defense

Key Argument: Lack of Deliberation

  • Main Argument: Nicholas Godejohn is not guilty of first-degree murder due to the inability to deliberate.
  • Complexity of Deliberation: It's a complex process, not a simple decision.

Gypsy Blanchard's Role

  • Desire for Escape: Gypsy wanted her mother, Claudine Blanchard, dead to escape her home.
  • Manipulation: Gypsy manipulated Nicholas into committing the crime.
  • Plans A, B, C: Multiple plans were devised by Gypsy to escape.
    • Attempted to run away.
    • Considered getting pregnant to escape.

Characteristics of the Individuals

  • Gypsy's Background:
    • Forced by her mother to pretend to be sick and remain childlike.
    • Learned manipulation from her mother.
  • Nicholas Godejohn:
    • Low-functioning individual with autism.
    • Manipulated by Gypsy due to his condition.
    • Childlike decisions and actions post-crime (e.g., mailing the murder weapon with a return address).

Unique Aspects of the Case

  • Unusual Dynamics: All involved are, in some way, victims and manipulators.
  • Childlike Behavior: Both Gypsy and Nicholas displayed childlike understanding and actions.

Psychological Evaluations

  • Dr. Franks: Asserted Nicholas has autism spectrum disorder level 2, affecting his deliberation ability.
  • Dr. Denny: Criticized Dr. Franks but had limited real experience with autism.
  • IQ Disparities: Nicholas’s IQ is significantly below average, which impacts his cognitive abilities.

Defense's Final Arguments

  • Lack of Cool Reflection: Emphasized Nicholas's inability for 'cool reflection,’ a requirement for first-degree murder.
  • Compassion Request: Asked the jury to have compassion for all involved, including Nicholas.
  • Reasonable Doubt: Suggested that reasonable doubt exists regarding Nicholas's capacity to deliberate.
  • Alternative Verdicts: Encouraged consideration of lesser homicide charges.

Closing Thoughts

  • Emphasized Nicholas’s love and intent to help Gypsy, though misguided.
  • Asserted that Nicholas’s actions were not premeditated due to his cognitive limitations.