Intelligence Matters: Insights on North Korea with Sid Seiler

Jul 11, 2024

Intelligence Matters: Insights on North Korea with Sid Seiler

Sponsorship

  • Sponsored by Flare, a leader in actionable cyber threat intelligence.
  • Flare offers continuous threat exposure management and monitoring across dark web and geopolitical risks.
  • Free trial available at flare.io.

Introduction

  • Host: Michael Morrell.
  • Guest: Sid Seiler, a leading expert on North Korea with over 42 years in U.S. government roles.
  • Topics: North Korea's treaty with Russia, provocations on the Korean Peninsula.

Sid Seiler's Background

  • Worked as a collector (signals intelligence, open source, human), analyst, and negotiator.
  • Served on the National Security Council staff at the White House.
  • Special Envoy for Six-Party Talks under Bush and Obama administrations.
  • Fluent in Korean and has served in various language-heavy positions.
  • Stress on maintaining a record reflecting accurate truths of the past four decades.

Discussion on U.S. Workforce Expertise

  • Necessity for building expertise in government on multiple issues (e.g., North Korea, China, Russia, Iran).
  • Balancing the need for a flexible vs. specialized workforce.
  • Wake-up call for improving expertise as crises emerge (e.g., Russia's invasion of Ukraine, China).

North Korea's Treaty with Russia

  • Recent treaty signed between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un.
  • Considered broad, aspirational, and missing details but reflective of a new international order.
  • Treaty obligations: mutual defense in case of invasion, aligned with UN Charter Article 51 on self-defense.
  • Historical context: similar to the 1961 treaty but the current environment is different from the Cold War.

Implications of the North Korea-Russia Treaty

  • Russia's actions in Ukraine and possible justifications under the treaty with North Korea.
  • Skepticism about Russia's actual willingness to risk nuclear war to defend North Korea.
  • The dilemma for North Korea on over-dependence on either Russia or China.
  • Possible support Russia might provide to North Korea: nuclear, WMD, space programs, and conventional military capabilities.

North Korea's Contributions to Russia

  • Providing artillery shells and short-range ballistic missiles for Russia's war effort in Ukraine.
  • Insights into the missile's performance and potential for improvements.

Leverage and Consequences of North Korea's Support

  • North Korea's critical assistance could leverage its position with Russia.
  • Speculative lists of what Russia might provide North Korea in return (e.g., nuclear, missile, conventional military support).
  • Concerns about emboldened North Korea acting militarily against South Korea.
  • China’s likely negative view towards North Korea's actions and the impact on regional stability.

Making Foreign Policy

  • The complexity and difficulty of policy-making compared to intelligence analysis.
  • Real-world dynamics and practicalities impacting policy decisions.
  • Also, insight into how North Korea's provocations have been historically deterred.

North Korean Provocations

  • Recent ramp-up in provocations, including sending trash or human waste over the border.
  • Complex motivations for these provocations, often proportionate and in-kind responses to U.S./South Korean actions.

Types of North Korean Provocations

  1. Tension Escalations (e.g., accidental border clashes).
  2. Deliberate, One-off Provocations (e.g., sinking of the Cheonan, shelling of Yeonpyeong-do).
  3. Revisionist Actions (e.g., seizing territory).
  • Historical examples and their implications for current and future policy.
  • NIE scenarios predicting likely provocation patterns and proposed policy responses.

The Role of International Relationships

  • Importance of the U.S.-South Korea-Japan trilateral relationship in countering North Korean and Chinese actions.
  • The recent bold moves in leadership necessary for fostering collaboration.
  • Institutionalized cooperation is critical despite historical grievances.

Conclusion

  • Continuous deterrence and preparation if deterrence fails are key policy goals.
  • Importance of keeping diplomatic channels open and maintaining international consensus.