Exploring Analytic Philosophy and Identity

Aug 2, 2024

Lecture on Analytic Philosophy and Identity

Overview of Philosophy

  • Analytic Philosophy as a reaction to earlier philosophical views, particularly the idea that everything is mental.
  • Questioning the nature of reality, knowledge, and ethics.
  • Early definitions often tied to specific philosophies, mostly abandoned by 1950.

What is Analytic Philosophy?

  • Not tied to a specific philosophical thesis.
  • Concerned with core philosophical questions: metaphysics, epistemology, ethics.
  • Often misunderstood as anti-philosophy; instead, it's a philosophical methodology.
  • Involves empiricism, linguistic analysis, and clarity.

Key Elements of Analytic Philosophy

  • Empiricism: Attention to empirical methods, not necessarily the full story.
  • Language: Focus on linguistic structure; some believe all philosophical questions are linguistic questions.
  • Clarity: A supreme virtue; contrasts with the more literary and opaque style of Continental Philosophy.
  • Analysis: Breaking down complex wholes into parts. Rooted in Descartes' analytic method.
    • Understanding wholes in terms of parts, constructing models (logical, mathematical) to explain concepts.

Historical Influences and Heroes

  • Aristotle: Empirical investigation, logical analysis, clarity, analyzing wholes in terms of parts.
  • Social Contract Theorists: Hobbes, Locke; breaking down complex ideas into simpler components.
  • Empiricists: Hume, Locke; analyzing complex ideas into simpler ones.
  • Rationalists: Descartes, Leibniz; breaking down wholes into parts.
  • Modern Influences: Frege, Russell; development of first-order logic, logical language.

Gottlob Frege

  • Born in 1848, died 1925; German mathematician, logician, philosopher.
  • Known for work in mathematical logic, particularly first-order logic.
  • Published Begriffsschrift (Concept Writing), foundation for modern first-order logic.
  • Developed new logical language, revolutionizing philosophical questions.

Frege's Puzzle on Identity

  • Distinction between statements of the form A = A (analytic, a priori, uninformed) and A = B (informative, not necessarily a priori).
  • Identity as a relation between objects or between names/signs of objects.
  • Examples:
    • Bruce Wayne is Batman: Highly informative.
    • Water is H2O: Conveys significant scientific information.

Sense and Reference

-Frege's Solution: Introducing the concept of 'sense' to distinguish it from 'reference.'

  • Sense: Mode of presentation, explaining how informative identity statements are possible despite having the same referent.
  • Reference: The actual object or concept being referred to by a name or term.
  • Examples:
    • Morning Star = Evening Star: Different senses, same reference (Venus).
    • Bruce Wayne = Batman: Different senses, same reference.
    • Water = H2O: Different senses, same reference.

Traditional Views on Language and Reference

  • Aristotle, Aquinas, Locke's View: Words as signs of ideas, ideas as likenesses of things.
  • Triangle Example: Word 'triangle' signifies the concept of a triangle, which refers to the object itself.
  • Tone: Emotional associations with words, separate from the concept.
  • Subjectivity: Concepts can vary from person to person, even if the reference remains the same.

Conclusion

  • Frege's Contribution: Distinguishing between sense (shared, external) and concepts (individual, internal) to resolve issues of informativeness in identity statements.
  • Next steps involve deeper exploration of Frege's sense and reference distinction and its implications.