🎭

Critical Review of Joker Film

May 25, 2025

A Joker Review: Summary and Key Points

Introduction

  • The review is highly critical of the film "Joker," directed by Todd Phillips and starring Joaquin Phoenix.
  • Describes "Joker" as a film that fails both as a comic book adaptation and as a standalone movie.

Critique of Joaquin Phoenix's Performance

  • Criticized for overacting and delivering unrelatable performances.
  • Compared unfavorably to actors like Robert De Niro, Jack Nicholson, Heath Ledger, and Mark Hamill.
  • Described as trying too hard and coming across as phony.

Critique of the Film's Direction and Style

  • Todd Phillips attempts to imitate "Taxi Driver" and "The King of Comedy."
  • The film is accused of lacking originality and failing to create an authentic Gotham City atmosphere.
  • Criticizes Phillips for being a comedic director out of his depth.

Critique of the Plot and Characters

  • Claims the plot is "nonexistent" and "adolescent."
  • The portrayal of Thomas Wayne is criticized for being villainous and unrealistic.
  • The twist involving Joker's girlfriend as a delusion is seen as predictable.

Criticism of Public and Critical Reception

  • The movie is seen as gaining defense due to audience attachment to the Joker character.
  • Critiques general audience reviews for lacking depth and objectivity.

Comparison to Other Films and Characters

  • Joaquin Phoenix's portrayal is unfavorably compared to characters in Scorsese films like "Taxi Driver."
  • Describes Phoenix's Joker as unintelligent, unlike Ledger's or Hamill's Jokers.

External Reviews

  • Summarizes several critical reviews from sources like NPR, The Guardian, and Time, all of which echo the negative perception of the film.

Conclusion

  • The review strongly concludes that "Joker" is a failure both as a film and within the Batman universe.
  • Expresses a personal opinion that the film is "pretentious garbage."

Author Information

  • The review reflects the personal opinions of its author, Aaron James Hills, and clarifies that it should not substitute for objective analysis.