🕵️‍♀️

Kirat's Catfishing Experience

Sep 28, 2025

Overview

This podcast episode recounts Kirat's experience as the victim of an elaborate, long-term catfishing scam orchestrated by her cousin Simran, exploring the emotional, psychological, and legal ramifications, as well as the challenges posed by current laws and societal perceptions.

Background and Initial Contact

  • Kirat was first contacted in 2009 by JJ, her cousin's boyfriend, and subsequently introduced to "Bobby," beginning a gradual online friendship.
  • Bobby, presented as a cardiologist from a South Asian Kenyan community, slowly built trust and intimacy with Kirat via lengthy Facebook messages.
  • The communication style reflected the norms of early Facebook, making the interaction seem innocuous.

Escalation of the Catfishing Scheme

  • Over time, many online personas (over 60 fake accounts) were introduced, all controlled by the catfisher.
  • Bobby’s story grew more dramatic, involving a shooting, "death," and supposed placement in witness protection, fostering further emotional investment.
  • Medical crises and claims of restricted communication justified the lack of video calls and inconsistent contact.
  • Emotional manipulation intensified; Bobby became controlling and coercive, isolating Kirat and impacting her mental health.

Discovery and Realization

  • Kirat became suspicious and hired a private investigator, leading her to confront "Bobby" in Brighton, unraveling the deception.
  • She discovered her cousin Simran had been behind all the fabricated personas for over a decade.
  • Simran confessed with little emotion or remorse, defying the stereotype of typical catfishers.

Aftermath and Institutional Response

  • Kirat reported the crime to the police but was not taken seriously and was told she was not the victim.
  • Simran faced no immediate consequences and continued with her life and career unimpeded.
  • The story highlights the lack of legal recognition for catfishing as a crime and the failure of institutions to support victims.

Broader Implications and Lessons

  • The case exemplifies how advances in social media and online interaction outpace legislation and police procedures.
  • Victims may be targeted by people they trust, making prevention and detection difficult.
  • There is a societal need to shift perceptions, support victims, and update legal frameworks to address online abuse.

Recommendations / Advice

  • Recognize the potential for sophisticated online deception, even from trusted individuals.
  • Law enforcement and legal systems should adapt to address online harms and support victims.
  • Society must avoid victim-blaming and instead question the motivations and behaviors of perpetrators.