State of global affairs: Changes in priorities affect appropriation of science and technology.
Case Studies
1. Birth Pains of Science (Aristotelian Philosophy)
Characteristics of Aristotelian Philosophy:
Simple scientific theories (e.g., four elements: earth, water, air, fire).
Influence of Society:
Dominance of the Church and Thomas Aquinas.
Conflict between science and religion; Aquinas’ synthesis led to the stagnation of scientific growth for nearly 2,000 years.
Outcome:
Stagnation of scientific progress due to church influence and lack of technology to verify theories.
2. The First Industrial Revolution (England)
Science Involved:
Power generation, new materials (e.g., steel), mechanics (Isaac Newton), and economics (Adam Smith).
Technology:
Introduction of machines in mining, manufacturing, construction, and transportation.
Societal Context:
England’s economy as a superpower; collaboration of factors (abundance of coal, capital from nobility, colonies).
Necessity-driven technological advancements to meet demands of production (e.g., clothing industry).
Outcomes:
Economic and cultural shifts; rise of Romanticism; onset of pollution due to fossil fuel use.
3. Modern Times (Genetics and GMOs)
Science:
Understanding of genetics and its application in genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Societal Concerns:
Food security: GMOs can increase yields and reduce wastage.
Health risks: Concerns about safety and potential hazards of GMOs.
Proprietary ownership of GMO seeds affecting farmers.
Outcomes:
Varied societal responses to GMOs based on cultural and regulatory contexts (e.g., US acceptance vs. Russian ban).
Importance of public understanding of scientific results via media.
Summary and Analogy
Analogy of driver and automobile:
Science: Brain of the driver.
Society: Body of the driver.
Technology: Automobile.
In industrialized societies, science leads; in other regions, society may dictate science and technology usage.
Science requires boundary conditions provided by society to yield beneficial results.
Emphasis on the need for science to address societal needs, fears, and priorities.
Conclusion
The interaction of science, technology, and society is multifaceted and influenced by various factors, requiring collaborative understanding among all three elements.