How The New York Times is Using Generative AI as a Reporting Tool
Overview
The New York Times (NYT) utilizes generative AI as a tool to aid reporters without replacing them.
AI assists in handling large volumes of data, allowing reporters to focus on the nuanced aspects of reporting.
Use of AI in Reporting
Transcription
NYT used AI to transcribe over 400 hours of audio from the Election Integrity Network meetings.
Automated transcription tools converted audio to text, resulting in nearly five million words.
AI transcription has improved significantly, with accuracy rates improving from 73% in 2018 to 94% in 2024.
This process aids reporters in quickly and accurately transcribing audio data at a lower cost.
Analysis
After transcription, large-language models (LLMs) were used to search for relevant topics, notable guests, and recurring themes in the transcripts.
LLMs help in summarizing complex documents, but have limitations such as confabulation and lack of deep understanding of context.
Human-AI Collaboration
Reporters manually reviewed AI-selected passages for accuracy and contextual relevance.
Human judgment is crucial to ensure that all quotes and video clips are accurate and fairly represent the original context.
By combining LLM capabilities with human insight, NYT can leverage AI's strengths while mitigating its weaknesses.
Limitations of AI
Australian government study indicated that AI summaries often lack depth and can be factually inaccurate.
AI's ability to understand subtle nuances or implicit meanings is limited compared to humans.
Conclusion
Generative AI serves as an aid rather than a replacement for human reporters.
AI functions similarly to a "drug-sniffing dog or truffle-hunting pig," identifying potentially interesting data for human review.
This hybrid approach allows for efficient large-scale data processing while retaining the accuracy and contextual understanding that human reporters provide.
About the Author
Kyle Orland, Senior Gaming Editor at Ars Technica, discusses the use of AI in journalism and the balance between AI tools and human expertise.