🔬

Scientific Method Principles

Aug 6, 2025

Overview

This lecture explains the scientific method, focusing on its six guiding principles to ensure valid, objective, and reliable scientific knowledge.

Importance of the Scientific Method

  • The scientific method provides a systematic way to gain valid knowledge about the world.
  • Opinions, beliefs, and informal logic are too subjective and prone to error for scientific inquiry.

Six Principles of the Scientific Method

1. Empirical Testability

  • A hypothesis must be empirically testable, meaning it can be supported or contradicted by observable data.

2. Replicability

  • Studies and findings must be replicable; repeating the study should produce the same results.

3. Objectivity

  • Procedures, assumptions, and concepts should be clearly defined so any researcher can independently reproduce the results.

4. Transparency

  • All relevant information about the research process and assumptions should be publicly shared to allow replication and critique.

5. Falsifiability

  • Hypotheses must be falsifiable; there must be conceivable evidence that could prove the hypothesis wrong.

6. Logical Consistency

  • Hypotheses and conclusions must be logically consistent and free of internal contradictions.

Critical Attitude in Science

  • Scientists should be open to criticism, transparent, and willing to abandon hypotheses if better evidence arises.

Key Terms & Definitions

  • Hypothesis — A testable statement predicting a relationship or outcome.
  • Empirical — Based on observable or measurable evidence.
  • Replicable — Able to be repeated with consistent results.
  • Objectivity — Minimizing personal bias in measurement and definition.
  • Transparency — Open sharing of procedures and data.
  • Falsifiability — The ability to be proven false through evidence.
  • Logical Consistency — Internal coherence without contradiction.

Action Items / Next Steps

  • Review the six principles and apply them to evaluating or designing research studies.
  • Be critical of hypotheses and open to peer feedback in scientific discussions.