Architecture Schools are Broken: A Modern Critique

Jul 18, 2024

Architecture Schools are Broken: A Modern Critique

Introduction

  • Main Argument: Modern architecture schools are failing by focusing more on novelty and experimentation rather than creating beautiful buildings in loved places.
  • New Renaissance: A few universities are reviving the lost arts of architecture, producing stunning designs.
  • Personal Journey: Presenter traveled to the US to observe and share these promising developments and offer tips to modern architecture students.
  • Organization: Presentation divided into multiple parts covering the problem, history, emerging solutions, and advice.

Part 1: Architecture School

  • Dreams vs. Reality: Desire to create beautiful, lively spaces, leading to urban planning and architecture studies.
  • Current Education Focus: Modern construction materials, experimentation, form and shape, sustainability, inclusion, and student creativity.
  • Skills Not Taught: Classical proportions, ornamentation, facade composition, traditional skills.
  • Student Experience: Many students unaware of the lack of traditional skills focus until they start their courses.

Part 2: How We Got Here

  • Historic Education: Reference to Julien Guadet's 'Elements and Theory of Architecture', teaching practical and skill-based knowledge till the 1930s.
  • Post-WWI Shift: Bauhaus influence, figures like Walter Gropius, Le Corbusier, etc., leading to modernist educational dominance.
  • Modernist Ascendancy: Mid-20th century migration of modernist architects to the USA reshapes architectural education toward modernism.
  • Modernism in Degrees: Traditional methods relegated to history or historic preservation courses; new construction education strictly modernist.

Part 3: Problems

  1. Misguided Priorities: Focus on innovation and novelty over basic architectural skills, leading to materials knowledge degradation.
  2. Modernist Monoculture: Education offers a narrow, modernist perspective, potentially leading to intellectual conformity and student discouragement.
  3. Pretentious Pseudoscience: Pseudo-scientific language and vague theories often used to justify unpopular design choices.
  4. Ivory Tower: Disconnect from public preferences and pressing societal issues like housing crisis, pollution, inequality.
  5. Messiah Complex: Misplaced belief in architecture alone solving global problems; often ignoring long-term sustainability and community preferences.
  6. Hypocrisy: Claimed commitment to diversity and inclusion not reflected in teaching of traditional architecture.

Part 4: Signs of Renaissance

  • Notre Dame School of Architecture: Returns to teaching classical design skills; ~99% job placement rate for graduates.
  • Catholic University of America: Strong model-building emphasis alongside modernist education.
  • Benedictine College: New but growing classical architecture program with strong student interest.
  • Other Schools: Utah Valley University, Miami School of Architecture, Kingston University (UK), NTNU (Norway).
  • Summer Schools and Part-Time Courses: Increasing availability internationally.

Part 5: Proposed Solutions

  1. Teach Real Skills: Emphasize foundational architectural design skills over fleeting trends.
  2. Serious Precedent Study: Deep understanding of building principles from historical contexts.
  3. Diverse Perspectives: Offer multiple architectural approaches to encourage intellectual diversity.
  4. Humbleness: Promote public service rather than architect-centric mindset.
  5. True Sustainability: Focus on enduring quality rather than superficial environmental certifications.
  6. Interest in Beauty: Encourage discussions and explorations of aesthetic values.

Part 6: Advice to Students

  • Community Building: Find like-minded peers via online forums (e.g., Discord) and collaborate for change.
  • Pursue Self-Education: Seek additional resources on traditional architecture independently.
  • Advocate for Change: Pressure universities to incorporate more traditional architectural skills and perspectives.
  • Future Responsibility: Students are the future of architecture, and they can drive meaningful reform.
  • Engagement: Share insights and start discussions to foster a broader dialogue on architectural education.

Conclusion

  • Call to Action: Encourages students and viewers to share the message, foster dialogue, and join the movement for better architectural education.