Your Parenting Mojo Podcast Episode on Polyvagal Theory
Introduction
Host describes this episode as more uncomfortable than previous episodes.
The discomfort stems from questioning the validity of Polyvagal Theory (PVT), which has been used in host's workshops, amidst a contentious debate in the field of psychology.
Polyvagal Theory Overview
Developed by Dr. Stephen Porges.
Three defining principles:
Hierarchy of the Autonomic Nervous System:
Safe state: Parasympathetic ventral vagal system activated; person feels safe and open to social engagement and play (ventral vagal state).
Mobilized state: Sympathetic nervous system activated; ready to respond to threat (fight or flee).
Immobilized state: Parasympathetic dorsal vagal system activated; person is shut down and unable to move.
Autonomic Nervous System Regulation:
A built-in surveillance system assessing risk (neuroception).
Trauma can cause faulty neuroception, leading to spending time in fight or flight mode unnecessarily.
Co-regulation:
Unconscious exchange of safety/danger signals through social engagement system.
Listener's Question
Listener Nanita questions the scientific support behind PVT, considering it potentially pseudoscientific.
Nanita contemplates the cultural and societal influences on scientific acceptance.
Research and Criticism of PVT
Dr. Paul Grossman's ResearchGate post questions evidence supporting PVT premises.
Grossman's critique highlights lack of evidence for three foundational premises of PVT.
Three core premises:
Neurogenic brachycardia and RSA mediated by different branches of the vagus.
Neurogenic brachycardia as a vestigial relic of the reptilian brain.
Withdrawal of cardiac vagal tone as a mammalian adaptation.
Grossman's critique indicates lack of evidence and challenges to these premises.
Scientific Theory and Revisiting PVT
The definition of a scientific theory as a well-substantiated explanation.
Questions on the rigidity and validity of PVT over time, lack of updates or revisions to its premises.
Alternative Theories
Mention of alternative models: Neurovisceral Integration, Biological Behavioral, Resonance Frequency, Psychophysiological Coherence models.
Theories focus on heart rate variability and emotion regulation.
Evaluating the Use of PVT
Framework for using theories:
Consider evidence against the theory and its alternatives.
Evaluate potential harm from using the theory.
Assess cultural fit and usefulness of the theory as a myth or story.
Conclusion and Cultural Context
Discussion on the importance of cultural fit in therapeutic practices.
Consideration of PVT as a myth or story to make sense of experiences and guide actions.
References to cultural healing practices and societal narratives in therapy.
Addendum: Scientific and Cultural Considerations
Emphasis on the need for broader perspectives beyond scientific reductionism.
Critique of the Safe and Sound Protocol (SSP) for lack of scientific validation.
Discussion on the societal implications of passivity encouraged by PVT.
Final Thoughts
Encouragement to balance safety with awareness of societal issues.
Acknowledgment of the complexity of integrating scientific, cultural, and personal narratives in understanding and managing psychological experiences.