We're actually going to start with our main story this week and it concerns an absolute fixation of the rights. Because even as the market crashed in the wake of Trump's tariffs, Fox News spent a lot of time on this. A women's fencer is defending her decision to take a knee to protest her trans opponent despite getting disqualified for her forfeit. A female fencer who's devoted years of her life to the sport was just disqualified. This is the civil rights issue of the hour, women's sports. Here's a story that everybody's going to be interested in. A female fencer stands up for fairness in women's sports. Wait, that's the story that everyone is going to be interested in. Are you sure about that? The story about fencing and not the one that's caused the stock ticket in the corner of your screen to go bright red like an inflamed hemorrhoid. Also, I challenge those anchors to tell me one thing about fencing besides Lindsay Lohan did it against herself in the parent trap. I don't think you can do it. The issue of trans athletes has become very important to conservatives in general and Donald Trump in particular. He talked about it at length in his address to Congress and signed an order titled Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports, which promised to rescend all funds from educational programs that allowed trans women and girls to compete. And at the signing ceremony, he adlibd the creepiest compliment possible. We're defending the rights and safety and pride of the American people, including our great great great female athletes. What athletes you are too, tell you. And you know, I'm not allowed to say this politically. It could end my career. They're really beautiful people. These are beautiful people. But but you know, like everything else, it's a little bit different today. You're not allowed to say that because if you call a woman or a girl beautiful, that's the end of your career. But let's take a chance on it, Mike. Let's take a chance. Okay. To be completely fair to Trump, I will say his understanding of women's issues is comparable to his understanding of foreign policy, domestic policy, trade, the economy, the concept of consent, human empathy, and all but one of his children's names. Trump leads every conversation with a psychosexual energy that makes the White Lotus look like the Teletubbies. Oh, I'm sorry. Did the incest story line bother you? Donald Trump joked about dating his own daughter on the View. He said that on a morning show. At least White Lotus has the DC to air in the evenings right here on the Incest Network. Trump's order has already prompted the NCAA to institute a ban on trans athletes participating in women's sports. But he is not done. He's also trying to pull $175 million in funding from UPEN for allowing one trans athlete to compete three years ago. And when Maine indicated it would resist his ban, he threatened to cut off all its federal funding despite the whole state apparently having just two trans girls total competing in girls sports. Two. And I know you might be thinking, "Okay, but in Maine, two kids is like half the kids, right?" But it's actually not. They've got more. This issue is an obsession for Republicans. Last year, they spent over $116 million just on TV ads featuring trans athletes. And the relentless focus on this over the years has had a meaningful impact with one poll showing more than six in 10 adults say trans girls and women should not be allowed to compete in girls and women's sports including high school and youth levels. 25 states have now imposed bans on them competing in schools. Even Gavin Newsome, pictured here as the villain in a Ryan Murphy production, recently said he thought trans athletes being allowed to participate in women's sports is deeply unfair without really elaborating on what he meant by that. And for trans kids impacted by these bands who just want to play sports with their friends, it's been hard. As this 15-year-old girl in New Hampshire explains, it's been stressful and difficult. Um, it's been annoying. I felt very annoyed and upset that this has been happening and that it's been happening towards a vulnerable community like the trans community. Yeah. And honestly, annoying is an understatement there. Annoying is what you say when your friend is late or your Wi-Fi is spotty or when you're a chicken minding your own business and suddenly you're on the news. You're hanging out eating dirty snow with seven or eight close friends and then boom, all of a sudden the AP is doing a close-up of your feet. That is annoying. But I know people have strong opinions on this subject. In our post-election show, I said there are vanishingly few trans girls competing in high school sports anywhere. And even if there were more, trans kids, like all kids, vary in athletic ability, and there is no evidence that they pose any threat to safety or fairness. After that show aired, JK Rowling herself issued the single longest tweet I've ever seen in my life, in which she claimed, among other things, that I'm happy to watch females suffer injury, uh, humiliation, and the loss of sporting opportunities to bolster an elitist postmodern ideology. And honestly, it feels a bit weird to catch that much heat from the creator of Harry Potter, especially when I clearly look like what would have happened to him if they just left him in that cupboard for the rest of his life. Now, I stand by everything I said in that episode, but I will concede that this subject is more complicated than people should just use the bathroom that corresponds with their gender identity. And since trans participation in sports seems for some reason to be at the center of our politics right now, it felt like tonight might be a good time to talk about it at real length. And in doing so, we're going to try and explain a few things. What the facts could actually tell us about trans athletes regarding competition and safety, where much of this seems to be coming from because it didn't crop up out of nowhere, and where it looks like things might be going. And let's start by acknowledging many people do have good faith questions about this, even if they're asking them a little clumsily. Here here's an example of one of those questions about fairness coming from a less than ideal source. Let's say Serena's in her prime and and and a tr you know and and who knows we'll make up the person right so you know some let's not make up the person let's say that that Rafa Nadal you know has some issue you know wants to transition and I just and wins the Wimbledon final or you know somebody wins the 100 meter dash at the Olympic I just I think that's a I think that's a net negative now clearly when it comes to questions of right wrong in sports. Lance Armstrong might be the last person you call just after the 1990 Chicago White Socks and the ear chunk that Mike Tyson bit off. But to be fair, I can see how at the most elite level of sports, an instantaneous switch like that would confer an advantage. It hasn't happened. And for what it's worth, in tennis, the WTA already has guidelines for transincclusion, requiring athletes maintain strict hormone levels for at least two years before competing with processes for dispute resolutions if necessary. So, they're already thinking about this and I presume will continue to do that. The thing is hypotheticals like that circulate constantly and often center around someone transitioning solely to gain a competitive advantage. But as this trans researcher points out, that is an absurd proposition. Trans women don't transition for sports. Um, no, no one has ever said, "Oh, yeah. I think I'd like to be a woman so I can do well in women's sports. When you go through a gender transition, um you lose so many things in life. My own mother said she never wanted to speak to me again. Um you know, I lost friends, family, got divorced. Um you'd go through all of that just to win a medal in sports. No. Um trans people transition because it's the only way that we can live happily, right? No one says, "I'm going to transition just for the sake of sports." The same way no one says, "Could you please send me more messages about two factor authentication or when I walk down the aisle, I'd like a solo violin cover of a bar with a bar by Kids Rock." That is just a madeup person. Still, let's engage with the underlying premise of that question from the world's most famous sports cheater that those assigned male at birth are automatically going to have certain immutable physical advantages. that gets raised constantly, which is why we're going to spend most of our time talking about trans women and girls, even though in these five states, these bands impact trans boys in schools, too. It is obviously true that on average, cisgender men and postpubescent boys have some specific athletic performance advantages, though the relative size of that advantage also depends on the sport and the event. in swimming. For instance, male athletic performance advantage is roughly 13% in the 50 m freestyle, but less than 6% in the 1500 meter free, which is still clearly significant. But in general, there's a lot of overlap in the average performance ranges of men and women. Basically, it is not the case that any man is going to be stronger or more athletic than every woman, which is sometimes what gets implied here, including by Donald Trump, who brought Riley Gaines, the former college swimmer who's become one of the most prominent voices on this issue, on stage to say this. Just to show you how ridiculous it is. Look at me. I'm much bigger and much stronger than her. There's no way she could beat me in swimming. Do we all agree? Huh? Thank you. Thank you. I don't agree, but I would like to see it. I would like to see the 78-year-old president try to swim in water against a former D1 swimmer. I'd like to bear witness to that event and whatever happens after it as a result of it occurring. But crucially, when it comes to trans athletes who've medically transitioned, studies of cis athletes are not necessarily relevant. A lot of medical gender- affirming treatments like hormone therapy have a meaningful impact on body and hormone composition. So the question then becomes what do those impacts mean for athletic performance? We spoke to scientists on all sides of this issue and the one thing they actually agree on is that in part because the number of trans athletes is so small. The body of research specifically about them is extremely limited. There are a bunch of studies comparing specific anatomical features like muscle mass in women who transition, but which don't directly speak to their impact on athletic performance, but we were only able to find 12 studies that actually tested trans adult women's physical fitness in a lab or other performance scenario. Eight have a sample size of less than 20 and two are of a single athlete. And look, I don't have any scientific experience, even though I look like a cross between a scientist and the profoundly sick mice he's studying. But you probably shouldn't draw broad conclusions off a sample size of one. Those 12 studies generally find that medically transitioning does impact trans women's performance, but disagree on how or by how much. That research you saw earlier actually published the only longitudinal study to date of multiple athletes studying the impact of transitioning on eight long-distance runners. She found after at least a year on hormone therapy, their race times turned out to be more athletically similar to those of cisgender women than cisgender men. But she herself will tell you the study was limited and his conclusions were nuanced. Here she is explaining what we do and don't know at this point. It is undoubtedly true that um trans women will maintain um advantages in some sports probably not so much in endurance sports but in in size and strength sports. Trans women will also have some physiological disadvantages. Our larger frames are now being powered by reduced muscle mass and reduced aerobic capacity. And that can lead to disadvantages in terms like quickness, recovery, endurance, things that maybe aren't quite as obvious as being bigger and stronger, right? Bigger and stronger bodies are not automatically advantaged in every scenario. I mean, put the Rock in a Purebar class and see what happens. I mean, we know what would happen. He'd take a video of himself, caption it, "Mad respect to these mammas. Everyone go see Moana, too." and tried to use it to sell his tequila before eating 13,000 pancakes and drinking a cow. We know what would happen. But the degree of difference here matters because we expect a certain amount of difference in athletics. Taller basketball players are expected to compete against shorter ones, faster soccer players, compete against slower ones. Michael Phelps was allowed to compete with other swimmers despite being part dolphin. And crucially, none of the studies I've mentioned so far bear much relevance to what these new laws target, which is youth sports, usually of all ages. And the research there is even more scant. We have no research about how being trans or undergoing gender- affirming treatment impacts athletic performance in teens. And when it comes to kids before the onset of puberty, I could talk about the study showing the subtle performance differences between boys and girls, but I'd argue when you're talking about seven-year-olds as a practical matter, that's a point where lots of school sports are co-ed anyway. And a key difference between competitors on a field can come down to whether a kid was born in October or April. And at this point, you might be saying, "Well, I don't need to wait for scientific research. This is all common sense, and I know what I've seen online." But a lot of what you've seen may not be quite what you think it is. Both when it comes to trans athletes impact on competition or safety. And let's start with competition because there's a big number that you tend to hear a lot. Listen to this. A shocking report from the United Nations states over 600 female athletes have lost close to 900 medals to transgender opponents. Female athletes have lost nearly 900 medals to transgender athletes. You had the United Nations study come out not long ago about 900 medals for females that ended up going to transgender athletes. Yeah, 900 medals. That is a go-to statistic. It was even cited on the floor of the Senate during their debate over a transports ban and featured prominently in JK Rowling's latest tome. But we got curious about that number. So we looked at that report and it turns out first it wasn't produced by the UN. It was submitted to it by a special rapotur who herself said its findings do not necessarily represent those of the UN. And if you go online to the footnote that it cites and click on it, you get sent to this website, she won, where anyone could submit an instance of a siswoman losing to a trans woman anywhere in the world in any competition, big or small. The author of that report insisted to us, I did not rely only on this source. But I will say the numbers she cites do match what was on the site back then. And they included competitions all the way back to 2001 and down to the level of a fun run in Topeka, Kansas and an Irish dance competition as well as activities where gender confers no advantage like poker. Also over a 100 entries on the list are in the field of disc golf which if you're unfamiliar involves frisbees being thrown into this thing, some kind of guantanamo for birds. And as if that weren't enough, the way they got to that 900 number has to do with how they counted the wins. Because on the list, one transwoman finishing first counts as three denied medals. The logic being the second place finisher should have come first, the third place finisher should have come second, and the fourth place finisher should have come third. And look, some will argue it doesn't matter how minor the competition, the women on that list were all unfairly deprived of their rightful place. But even some of those women don't feel that way. This one, a disc golfer, has publicly stated she's happy to see trans people in disc golf. And an amateur cyclist named Kristen Charas is actually on the list twice because for some reason a single race she lost is on there under two different spellings of her name. She came in third behind two trans women, but she has made it clear they are her friends and she has no problem competing with them. I think that it would be ridiculous to say that my life is being ruined by getting third in this. It would be ridiculous to sacrifice other people getting to have fun in a sport that they love on the weekends so that I could say I was the state champion. Yeah, you could tell she's not upset because a she's giggling through that interview and b that is a very happylooking photo. I have, and this is true, never once smiled that freely in my life. Look how joyful they are. That looks like an ad for cycling or for having friends or honestly just for mud. So for all the talk of how trans women are so dominant they'll spell the end of women's sports. The number people keep citing to prove that has I would argue a pretty big thumb on the scale. And even the famous individual cases are sometimes missing a lot of context. You may have seen this photo of two trans high school runners in Connecticut coming first and second at a state track meet. They were the subject of a lawsuit claiming, among other things, their participation wasn't just unfair, it threatened to deprive their competitors of scholarships. But you should know, one of the plaintiffs actually beat one of those girls twice just 2 days after the suit was filed. Also, most of the plaintiffs ended up getting scholarships while these two did not. But the most famous example is probably Leah Thomas. As you probably know, she's a swimmer who initially competed on the University of Pennsylvania men's team, including one year while undergoing hormone therapy as part of her medical transition as per the NCAA's rules at the time. She made national headlines after she won the NCAA championship in the women's 500 freestyle. She got a good time in that race, her best of the season, although it was also a full 9 seconds behind the record set by Katy Leiddki. It's also the only race she won at that meet. She came in eighth in the 100 freestyle and in what's weirdly her most consequential race, she tied for fifth in the 200 free with Riley Gaines who catapulted to conservative stardom off the back of that race and I will let Riley herself tell you the story of how Leah Thomas and the NCAA wronged her. I look up at the board before I even looked at my name. I looked at Thomas's name and I saw the number five and I look beside my name and there's a five. The NCAA official looks at Thomas and myself and says, "Great job, but you guys tied and we only have one trophy, so we're going to give this trophy to Leah." Thomas held the trophy for fifth place. Gains held the one for sixth. They told me when pictures were being taken, Thomas had to have the trophy, which just reduced it down to a photo op. I felt so belittled. I felt so betrayed. Okay, so a few things there. First, that's a story about how Leah Thomas prevented Riley Gains from getting fifth place instead of fifth place. Second, those trophies look absolutely identical. Third, yes, it was a photo op in the sense that everybody arranged themselves for the purposes of taking a photo. And while we're talking about photo ops, I don't know, man. You were on the stage at CPAC so an objectively drownable man could announce that he'd beat you in a race. That's about as photo opy as it's ever going to get. So, just so we are clear, Leah Thomas didn't take anything from Riley Gaines. In fact, you could argue she gave a lot to her as Gaines later decided to forego dental school in order to be an activist and speaker. She she now has her own advocacy center and has personally lobbied multiple state legislatores for bands all to address the threat post to women's sports by a woman who swam exactly as fast as she did to the literal hundth of a second. So from the 900 medals to the scholarships these girls did not get to the most famous fifth place finisher in human history, the competition argument is already a lot weaker than it tends to get presented. So what about safety? Well, first, in plenty of sports like track and swimming, there is no safety threat because they're not contact sports. But in others, like basketball and volleyball, there clearly is some amount of contact either with another body or with a ball. But even there, the big anecdotes that get thrown around tend to be more complicated. The most famous example concerns Payton McNab, a three sport high school athlete who was hit in the face by a spike during a volleyball match. She suffered injuries, including a concussion, and started speaking out against the policies that allowed the trans player who spiked the ball to play. The video of her getting hit often makes the rounds in these debates, and she told her story to the North Carolina State Legislature before they implemented their ban. She also attended Trump's address to Congress and appeared in a video about the incident produced by an activist group for which she and Riley Gaines are now ambassadors. A couple years ago, I was severely injured in a high school volleyball game by a male on the opposing team, leaving me with permanent injuries that the doctors don't know if I'll ever be able to recover from because of my career ending injury. Um, I was no longer to per able to perform the way I had the in the past. Progressive gender ideology being pushed so harshly is exactly the root of why this was allowed to happen to me. If it wasn't pushed so harshly, this could have been 100% avoided. Okay, I'll say this. Unlike holding up a trophy with a six on it for 40 seconds, a concussion is genuinely traumatic. Though, for what it's worth, she did go on to play softball in the spring and did pretty well, judging by her school posting this image about her making the allconerence team and a local paper pointing out she helped her team to a 5-0 start. And I'm not saying she wasn't injured or that it didn't have some impact on her performance, but a lot of the groups heavily pushing this story seemed to be overselling it, including choosing to title that video Killshot, how Pate McNab turned tragedy into triumph. Because Killshot is not a good title for a teenage girl who is very much alive and talking to a camera. Killshot is either a movie where Kano Reeves and Anna Armas, opposing spies and devastating marksmen fall in love, or a hunting reality show that gets canceled after its host Donald Trump Jr. is mowled by a moose in heat. And and that is not the only volleyball related story that's been oversold. Last year, there was a controversy over a trans player for San Jose State University. Other teams forfeited games rather than compete with her, and one of her own teammates joined a lawsuit to stop her from playing. But watch as this story mentions something at the end that puts a bit of an asterisk on that teammate's argument. When asked about how and why she felt unsafe, Sleser said, "The height that the person can jump is so much higher and honestly higher for a man. It's insane. And then the strength behind the ball when they're swinging is also just so much more powerful." But her transgender teammate stats don't appear to give the Spartans a dramatic upper hand. The San Jose State women's volleyball team is ranked 119th nationally. Wow, you must be in a very competitive league since it sounds like you've got one of the Avengers on your team. And yet somehow you're still only ranked 119th. That lawsuit initially claimed that the player spikes were estimated to be traveling upwards of 80 mph. A speed, by the way, that would make her as powerful as some of the hardest hitting men's volleyball players in history. But when ESPN used camera calibration software to analyze video of five of her spikes, including ones that went viral for being dangerous, they average around 50 mph, which is fast, but it's also a full speed limit in the suburb slower than what the lawsuit initially claimed. And look, they've since amended that lawsuit, deleting the 80 mph line, telling us that it was a mistake and that they meant to say 60 instead. Though notably, they only did that after ESPN published its report. The point is, her spikes were nowhere near record setting, which may be why she didn't rank in the top 150 in hitting percentage in the NCAA. And look, some trans kids are going to injure their opponents the same way any kid will. And concussions are horrible. Although they're also not that uncommon in youth sports, given between one to two million of them happen every year. Even in the wake of Pton McNab's injury, two coaches whose team had played against the trans player for the previous four years, spoke up at a school board meeting to say they were happy to keep doing so. One apparently told the meeting, "Every time a student plays, there's an inherent risk of injury and that she'd seen sis girls hit the ball harder than the one in the video." And the other coach asked, "If they're slated to play a team with a player who is 100% girl and she hits the ball harder than the player in question, should that game be forfeited?" And that's the thing. The standard can't be no trans kid ever injures someone because that's an impossible standard. And yes, if trans kids were injuring sis kids at much higher rates, then we could have safety concerns to address. But there's no evidence that's the case. And at this point it is worth asking what is really behind all this vitro because again I do believe that some speaking against trans participation are just talking about women's sports. And the truth is at the elite levels of competition this isn't a cut and dry issue. But in many other cases the opposition comes from a much more toxic place. It is not just about denying trans women the right to play. It's about denying them the right to exist. Mike Johnson basically said as much after the House passed its ban on trans athletes when he said this. We know from scripture and from nature that men are men and women are women and men cannot become women. That's right, Mike. As scripture tells us, men are men and women are women and God is his own son. And some mothers are virgins and some mothers-in-law are pillars of salt and some daughters are sex partners and colorful coats are dream tellers and brothers and murderers. And also brothers are backup. Husbands for wives and babies can be for splitting in half and water is wine and also with you. Sorry and with your spirit. Now the anti-inclusion camp objects to being called hateful, bigoted or intolerant, usually right before or after saying something most would consider qualifies. Here is Riley Gaines doing just that. I don't want to be considered a bigot or a transphobe or all of those labels. There's no hate in my heart. But me myself personally, I don't actually think this person is a woman. I don't actually think this person is a female. Therefore, when I say she, I feel like I'm going against my moral compass. Yeah. But it turns out there is a lot of distance between I don't want to be considered a transphobe and I don't want to be a trans phobe. even greater than the distance between you and first place in that race you make such a big deal about. The thing is his current uproar is rooted in a very intentional political strategy by the right to find a new issue after losing the war over samesex marriage. Conservatives embrace of this issue came after the failure of so-called bathroom bills around the country which were widely criticized. The president of the American Principles Project, a socially conservative advocacy group, has openly said, "We pivoted to the sports issue and it's been wildly successful." He even explained the reason for that, arguing what it did was it got opponents of the LGBT movement comfortable with talking about transgender issues. And he's kind of right about that, cuz it does seem like right now you can basically say anything you want about trans people as long as you tag on in sports after it. I don't think trans women should be allowed in sports. I don't think trans women are women in sports. But it is noticeable just how fast the in sports part can drop off once people feel that permission has been granted to the point that some leading voices in this movement are now circling back to bathroom bans. An issue that a decade ago people felt was a bridge too far. Last year, for instance, Pton McNab tweeted a video of her confronting a trans woman with the caption, "A man using the girl's bathroom at Western Carolina University. Unreal." Which is really nasty. And for the record, ambushing strangers just minding their own business is not what girls bathrooms are for. Girls bathrooms are for gassing each other up, making best friends in 30 seconds, complimenting tops, tucking in tags, and zipping up dresses. While one girl says, "OMG, that lipstick looks so good on you." The other says, "30% off at Sephora right now." And the first girl says, "Like now? Now?" And she responds, "Yeah, I went yesterday." She says, "Oh, you're my hero. I've been looking for a nude that goes my blotchy skin tone." And the other says, "Girl, stop it. I would kill for those freckles. You know, people are buying them now." And the first one's like, "You're right. We got to be loving ourselves." And the other one is like, "We absolutely do. That is what girls bathrooms are for." I am told I have no idea. put your phone away and build some community, Payton. And the reason this has been an easier cell for the right is that it's possible to frame all of this as being about protecting women and girls. Although, if that is truly the aim, there is reason for them to feel a lot less safe thanks to these bills. As in practice, they can encourage adults to police the bodies of literal children. That has happened. In Florida, a trans kid was kicked off a team after an investigation which resulted in a report about her that was more than 500 pages long and included investigators asking three girls on her volleyball team if they'd ever seen her undressed. And in Utah, the parents of a girl who was not trans were horrified when a local member of the state board of education felt empowered to do this. Utah State Board of Education member Natalie Klene posted this picture with the caption girls basketball dot dot dot. The couple describes their daughter, whose image KSL is blurring, as a tomboy. She cut her hair short because that's how she feels comfortable. She wears clothes that are a little baggy. She goes to the gym all the time, so she's got muscles. They said their family is rallying around their daughter. They have a message to other families experiencing bullying. And I want all the kids to know that it's okay to just be who they are. That is awful. And I hope it goes without saying, but random adults should not be publicly interrogating the gender of children on Facebook. People really shouldn't be on Facebook at all unless they're a locked in a bidding war for a barely used set of end tables or b trying to figure out if a family friend died or if they're just intimately posting about praying. Those are the only two acceptable uses of Facebook left. But obviously the bulk of the damage here is being done to trans kids. Cuz one thing we know for sure is that for all kids, the benefits physiological, social, and emotional of participating in school sports, teams, and athletics are wide ranging. And to hear trans kids themselves tell it, participation can be especially important to their feeling of community and sense of self. I love track because I feel like I'm a part of a second family. It's like another bond that you experience. This has helped me so much. Being able to be part of a sport and part of a team is such an incredible amazing experience for me. Without football, uh, I don't quite know if I would still be here because it it's given me a sense of belonging. Uh, it's take it's taken away the spotlight on the fact that I am transgender and it's just allowed me to be a boy and it's allowed me to be a kid. That is a really moving thing to hear. And if you're experiencing a weird sensation after that clip that you can't quite place, it's because it was nice. It was happy kids talking about how they're able to be themselves. And you don't usually get nice things on this show, which at this point is honestly mainly dense statistics and facts. and occasional Pikachu porn. Being trans can mean seeing your body as a barrier to living life as your authentic self, especially when you're young and especially in social situations. And it's not even necessarily about being good at sports. Because for all the focus on a handful of high performing athletes, it is helpful to remember lots of trans kids, like any kids, are terrible at sports. That teenager you just saw, Ember, was a backup catcher who said, "I'm mediocre at best." And her mom goes even further. How would you describe Ember's um athletic prowess? There really isn't much. How about any home runs? She's never hit a home run in her life. Wow. That is a supportive mom making it very clear that she will protect trans kids, but only to a point. And I love the honesty there. Athletic proess, that would be a negative. Home runs, hard no. I'm going to answer your question with a direct accurate hit. Something my daughter could frankly only dream of. So yeah, Ember is not great at softball, but she wanted to play anyway, and she met all of her state's requirements to do so, including undergoing at least a year of hormone therapy. But as soon as she was approved, the state started moving to implement a ban. And when she testified against it, she dropped in a little extra piece of info. Others have said that I should just play baseball with the boys. In many ways, this would be easier. I wouldn't have to go through the time-consuming and embarrassing process of of submitting in intimate medical details to the state. Also, the boys at my school have two beautiful fields to play on. Most years, our softball team has to cancel half of our games because our old field has no drainage. But the fact is that for me, playing on a boy's team would be a lie. Yeah, that makes sense. And you know, it says something that people seem more concerned about a trans girl on the field than they do about the field itself turning into a swimming pool half the time. And I realize I'm taking a risk by saying the word swimming pool out loud. Because if you say that phrase three times, Riley Gain shows up, ties for fifth, and then dead names everyone in a 50 mile radius. Unfortunately though, Ohio bans trans athletes anyway. And that insistence on aggressively legislating around a handful of trans kids, one neglecting much bigger systemic issues around youth sports just isn't a one-off. Take Kentucky. Three years ago, they passed one of these bans, even though at the time there was just one known trans athlete, a 12-year-old competing in schools there. The governor, to his credit, vetoed it. But the legislators would not let it rest because on the second to last day of the session, they voted to override his veto with one member doing so with real regional theater energy. Veto to Senate Bill 83. Gentleman from McCracken. Mr. Speaker, I move for final passage of Senate Bill 83, the veto of the governor notwithstanding. Yeah, they felt so strongly about protecting young female athletes. darkest timeline Drew Kerry here was willing to step in, but the urgency on display there notably didn't seem to apply to other issues concerning you youth athlete safety because last year an investigation revealed a long-standing pattern of sexual abuse in youth sports in Kentucky. It pointed out a bill that might have helped prevent that was this one, which would have made it harder for school personnel, including coaches who've been accused of misconduct, to move from district to district. It's been called the most comprehensive bill to address the issue. Unfortunately, it stalled out in the legislature for an infuriating reason because it made it through both chambers and only needed a procedural vote to be sent to the governor to sign. But it just sat there and on the last day of the session, it still hadn't passed. And then this happened. The members are hungry and we quite possibly have considered the last bill of the session. However, I'm not 100% that that is the case. So, out of an abundance of caution, we're going to recess into the call of the chair. Yeah, they off to dinner and guess what? They never came back to vote. So, it seems this is how the Kentucky State House works. When there is one kid who wants to play field hockey, it's Pearl Harbor. But when there's a long-standing pattern of sexual abuse, it's sorry, we got a 6 p.m. reservation at the Cheesecake Factory. And for those who've played girls sports, this sudden interest from lawmakers is a little hard to take. Given for so long, it's meant having to put up with constant slights and indignities. from worse playing fields to smaller locker rooms to creepy coaches no one will do anything about to always having to play your games early while the 8:00 p.m. boys game gets treated like the main event. I cannot tell you how many times multiple writers who worked on this story and who played women's sports brought that last point up. And now we seem to be hellbent on adding to all that the fear that if girls get too short a haircut or go to the gym too much a stranger on Facebook is going to start just asking questions. And look, this is the part of the show where I usually talk about what to do, but a lot of this is currently out of our hands. When it comes to state level bans, thankfully, court orders are blocking enforcement of them in all of these states. And courts are also going to have to weigh in on Trump's executive order, which some states have admirably resisted, none more memorably than Maine, whose governor had this standoff with Trump. I understand Maine. Is Maine here? The governor of Maine down here. Are you uh not going to comply with it? I'm complying with state and federal laws. Well, I'm We are the federal law. Well, you better do it. You better do it because you're not going to get any federal funding at all if you don't. You better comply because otherwise you're not getting any any federal funding. Yeah. Yes. You get it, mate. You get it. And you know what? I take back everything mean that I have ever said about you, mate. like that you're lobster stuffed lighthouse perverts that the rest of the Northeast loves to forget. I still broadly think that to be true, but I'm not going to be saying it out loud anymore because that is honestly heartening to me. As is the fact that when Republicans tried to pass a nationwide ban on trans participation in sports, it failed in the Senate after every single Democrat voted against it. And it's been inspiring to see some of these trans kids teammates coming out hard against the way their friends are being treated. For instance, in Florida, where that transirl was kicked off her team, thanks to again an investigation that was more than 500 pages long, Keats in her school staged a walk out in protest. And one of her teammates went on the local news and didn't hold back. Their main argument is about um fairness and like sports and how she probably could have like helped us win in ways or like about fairness and equaleness in sports, but like how about like fairness among like humans, just us as humans? Because right now she's not being treated like a human. If she were here, you could say something to her. What would you say? How much I love her and I I'm always there for her genuinely as a human. Like I do like I love her so much and she deserves to be treated as just like everybody else. Yeah, she's right. She's completely right. She just encapsulated the argument I've been trying to make for over half an hour, but with a vibe both more emotional and also substantially more chill. So, first, thank you for that, Jordan. And second, sorry to everyone else, because now we're going back to my energy, which we all know is significantly worse. And look, for the final time, I will concede there are degrees to which this issue is meaningfully complicated. But I'd also argue those complications are at the elite levels of specific sports and we can have conversations about what elite means and where exactly to draw that line. We can engage in good faith debate about policies that actually balance competition and inclusion. But it is ironic that at the highest levels, some sporting associations are still being thoughtful and deliberate about this. even as we are passing blanket bans for elementary schools, which is brutal because you've seen how much sports means to the kids who play them. Taking that away is not a harmless act. Not for these kids or the multiple others you haven't heard from tonight. Some of whose stories we couldn't even show you because the environment for trans kids is so toxic right now that they asked us not to draw attention to them for their safety. So if you are someone for whom this is just about the integrity of competition and for a lot of the loudest people pushing this, I don't think it is. But if that is the case for you, then I do acknowledge we're going to disagree about some things. But the one thing I'd ask of you is that you recognize the ugliness of how this issue gets discussed and how it's being cynically used by some to advance the eradication of trans people generally. to get back to what they know from scripture that trans people are a myth. You know, the same scripture that tells us the devil is an unemployed angel and hair is for footwashing or super strength and two fish and some bread is a catering order and votes for emergency zoos. Thanks be to God. And and just to be clear, I'm not happy to watch women experience injury, humiliation, and a loss of sporting opportunities. But that includes trans women and kids, and they seem to be getting hurt the most right now. Meanwhile, there are much bigger issues regarding women's sports that we should actually be addressing. And maybe that could be what lawmakers prioritize because for so many who are loudly claiming they're going to bat for women's sports, if I may paraphrase, the single most honest mom of all time, so far they've never hit a home run in their life.