Transcript for:
Anthropological Research Methods

ANTHROPOLOGY RESEARCH METHODS

  • The main method of study for anthropologists is participant observation, which involves living with a subject group for an extended period of time & engaging in their daily activities.
  • Anthropologists can supplement their observations by receiving information from some members of the culture that they are studying; informants.
  • In these semi-structured interviews, they ask a long list of open-ended questions to informants and takes notes regarding their answers.
  • During these semi-structured interviews, the anthropologist will learn both :
    • Explicit cultural knowledge – information about a culture that is easily explained and described, such as kin networks, common stories and myths, and histories.
    • Tacit cultural knowledge – information about a culture that the people within the culture or organization know but have difficulty explaining such as use of personal space, gestures(eye contact, etc) or proper behaviour.
  • To live in another culture, anthropologists might have to learn:
    • a new language
    • to adapt to new foods
    • new hygiene standards
    • different social conventions/ expectations
    • Live in different climates
    • Understand cultural roles – i.e. gender roles Can an outsider ever truly understand a new culture?
  • One of the main challenges of fieldwork in anthropology is whether an outsider can possibly ever truly understand the behaviour in another culture.
  • Anthropologists would argue that being an outsider gives them a unique view that an insider would not necessarily have (etic perspective).
  • However, those with an emic perspective, the point of view of an insider of a culture, generally believe that all people define the real world of objects events & creatures in the same way as they do.
  • Which perspective do you feel would be most beneficial in fieldwork? Why?

Observation and Note Taking

  • During participant observation researchers must take detailed notes or Concrete notes, that provide a full description of an incident, including its participants, location, tone,& conclusion.
  • They will use these notes to draws conclusions about what has been observed and in their study of the group.
  • Participant observers must not only observe carefully and in detail – they must also try to understand the world as the informants see it.
  • This means they are showing reflexivity; they try not to judge what they see using standards from outside the informants own culture. Concrete vs Vague Notes
  • Consider the following examples describing an incident in a high school class:
  • Example 1 – Student A spoke angrily to Teacher B
  • Example 2 – After Teacher B asked Student A to get off her phone, Student A became loud, disrespectful and angry. Student A yelled “Why do you always pick on me, I am not the only one on my phone!! Why don’t you tell Student B to get off their phone as well?” Student A slammed the desk with her hand and stormed out of the room.
  • Which of these examples would resemble what is expected for an anthropologist’s field notes?
  • Example 1 is an example of what would be considered vague notes – notes that merely describe something that happened and who was involved.
  • Example 2 is an example of what would be considered concrete notes – notes that describe all of the necessary elements: the tone of the incident, who was involved, where it took place, an example of what was said, a physical action, and how the incident ended.