Canon R5 Mark II Impressions and Insights

Aug 22, 2024

Lecture Notes: Canon R5 Mark II First Impressions

Introduction

  • Presenter: Josh
  • Topic: First impressions of the Canon R5 Mark II camera.
  • Content Focus: Video capabilities, initial testing, and personal opinions.

Canon R5 Mark II Overview

  • Launch Context: It's been 4 years since the R5 Mark I.
  • Purpose: This is not a review but initial impressions after 24-hour usage.
  • Disclaimer: Unbiased opinion; the camera was purchased personally with no sponsorship from Canon.

Video Setup & Shooting

  • Shooting Mode: 4K 24 Fine Mode (oversampled 8K to 4K)
  • Profile: C-Log2 (new for R5 Mark II) in XF EVC, H.265 codec, base ISO of 800.
  • Lenses Used:
    • RF 24-70mm
    • RF 100-500mm
  • ND Filters: Used DC True Color 1-5 Stop Variable ND Filter.
  • Image Quality: Described as accurate, clean, pleasant, and punchy with life.

Key Features and Upgrades

  • C-Log2:
    • Major upgrade, previously not available on cameras like the R5C.
    • Dynamic range appears improved, especially in shadows and highlights.
  • Autofocus and Stabilization:
    • Tested for birds and humans; compared to R3.
    • Autofocus is quick and snappy; stabilization is solid.

Ergonomics and Build Quality

  • Design: Similar to R5C; notable features include:
    • Full-size HDMI port.
    • On-off switch ergonomically placed.
    • Comfortable grip.
  • Viewfinder & Screen:
    • EVF from R3, large and clear.
    • LCD screen comparable to R5 Mark I.
  • Storage:
    • One CFexpress B and one SD card slot.
  • Battery: LPE 6P battery, seems better than R5C.

Usability & Menu System

  • Menu Changes:
    • Adopted elements from Canon cinema operating systems.
    • Custom picture files for log modes.
  • Waveform and False Color:
    • Histogram and waveform available; waveform stays on while recording.
    • False color requires view assist to be off.

Issues & Concerns

  • Screen Issue: Green stripes appeared twice.
  • Crop Mode: Switching affects quality settings.
  • View Assist: Lacks contrast and saturation.

Final Thoughts

  • Overall Impression: Strong image quality and dynamic range.
  • Limitations: Considerations for overheating and runtime as it's a photo hybrid camera.
  • Cost: High price point at $4,300, additional costs for batteries and cooling grip.

Future Plans

  • Content Creation: Planned deep dives into different camera aspects.
  • Comparisons: Intentions to compare with other models (R5C, C70, etc.).
  • Engagement: Invitations for viewer questions and topics of interest.