if result retracted he would not have been executed but he was executed therefore rizal did not retract it hello everyone i am marvin cabanero if this is your first time on my channel i create educational motivational and tutorial content if you don't want to miss any of my uploads don't forget to subscribe and click the bell icon to get notified whenever i upload videos so as you can read on the title itself our topic for today is all about the retraction controversy is it genuine or it is an act of forgery one of the controversial issues in the study of life works and writings of result is the historicity and veracity of certain acts which allegedly result had performed a few moments before he was led out execution more specifically his alleged reconciliation with the catholic church and his observation of masonry known as the retraction okay so before anything else before we proceed and before we go on to our discussion let's define first what do we mean by retractions [Music] attraction so the question here is what is the truth with regard to this matters did rizal in the last moments of his life really retract and observe masonry did he really go back to the faith of his fathers if he did where is the alleged retraction letter one of the many versions of the retraction letter which version is authentic who said it is authentic these are the questions that call for clear and categorical answers from the impartial news of history so deets are attraction especially [Music] against the catholic church and against the spanish government okay let's begin with the evidences presented by the roman catholic church of course the roman catholic church is a great believer that rizal died as a catholic and he absorbed his masonic views [Music] so the first evidence is the retraction document or the retraction paper is the chief eyewitness of the retraction itself since its discovery in 1935 so it will second evidence result recited and signed the prayer book entitled acts of faith hope and charity so it only burn acts of fourth evidence presented by the catholic church is that rizal performed acts of piety during his last 24 hours so bagusha executed on december 30 1896 okay and the fifth evidence presented by the roman catholic church is the church solemnized results marriage with josephine brahen so those are the evidences presented by the roman catholic church and now let's move on to the evidences and point of view of the resales the first evidence presented by the people who believe that resulted not retracted is that the retraction document is forgery or peke okay as pointed out by pascual the handwriting on the retraction is questionable okay second evidence the other acts and facts do not fit well with the story of retraction and some of the following are the retraction document wasn't made in public until 1935 so um hindi salumabas bhagavad 1935 so initial public s [Music] document okay second evidence that was presented by those people who believe that result did not retract it is that no effort was made to save resolve from that penalty even after saying his execution right so yeah my point is all three evidence results brielle was kept in secret and then there's a previous discussion december 30 1896. for evidence the record of his burial was not placed on the entrance of december 30 1896 but rather it was placed on a special page okay so number ten on december 30 december 38 96 indeed do not indicate okay so it's a special place parama okay fifth evidence there is no marriage certificate or public record of results marriage with josephine bracken okay certificate evidence results behavior did not point to a conversion during his last 24 hours before his execution master peace nami ultimate and the last evidence presented by those people who believe that result is not retracted is that the retraction itself is out of character it is not in keeping with results character and faith incongruency and irrelevant statement when it comes to religion okay while biographers historians and students on the life works and writings of asa result are divided on the issue of retraction it cannot be denied that this issue neither adds nor diminishes his greatness as a filipino rizal's contribution to the nation building makes the people revere him the attraction has been an issue for a very long time and even up to this deep in agdada batean [Music] and against um spanish officials but for me hindi naganon whether he retracted or not because [Music] so that ends our topic for today i hope you have learned something and i hope my natural chao regarding is a results retraction controversy and if you have learned something please do like and subscribe to my youtube channel thank you so much for watching see you next time goodbye [Music]