📚

Ethnic Studies and Student Activism at Berkeley

Apr 18, 2025

Lecture on Ethnic Studies and Student Activism at UC Berkeley

Introduction

  • Emphasis on the importance of ethnic studies: Chicano, Asian-American, Native American, and African American studies.
  • Poem highlights resistance and the embodiment of struggle.

Historical Context

  • 1969: Original Third World Liberation Front (TWLF) at UC Berkeley fought for the creation of a Third World College.
    • Demands included departments for Asian, Black, and Chicano Studies.
  • 1999: Berkeley students organized to save the ethnic studies department.
    • Movement referred back to the 1969 TWLF.

Reasons for Ethnic Studies

  • Ethnic studies provide perspectives outside the European viewpoint.
  • Education should reflect the histories and realities of people of color in the U.S.

The 1999 Student Strike

  • Influenced by global protests and liberation movements.
  • Lasted 10 weeks, marked by significant resistance and violence.
    • National Guard involvement and use of tear gas.
  • Resulted in the establishment of the Department of Ethnic Studies at UC Berkeley.

Challenges Faced

  • Early 1990s: Severe budget cuts amidst an economic recession in California.
  • Ethnic studies departments faced scrutiny and criticism.
  • Anti-immigrant propositions (e.g., 187, 209, 227) increased the need for ethnic studies.

1999 Student Activism

  • April 14th: Students occupied Barrows Hall demanding faculty hiring and department support.
    • Hunger strike initiated as a non-violent protest.
  • Demand for ethnic studies linked to broader societal issues: bilingual education, affirmative action, rights of immigrants.

Administration's Response

  • Initial refusal to negotiate.
  • April 29th: Hunger strike began with students camped outside California Hall.
  • May: Mass arrests of protesters during nighttime police raid led to increased support and community involvement.

Negotiations and Outcome

  • Chancellor Berdahl: Initially resisted negotiations.
  • Pressure from community, faculty, and increased student activism forced negotiations.
  • Agreed on faculty hiring and creation of new centers, but amnesty for arrested students not fully addressed.

Reflection and Legacy

  • Collective action was key to success.
  • Significant gains achieved: additional faculty positions, new Institute for the Study of Race and Gender, Multicultural Student Center.
  • Continued need for activism emphasized; struggle seen as ongoing.

Conclusion

  • While not all demands were met, the movement marked a significant victory for ethnic studies at UC Berkeley.
  • The struggle for ethnic studies is linked to broader social justice issues and requires ongoing commitment.