Cohen's D vs. Hedges' G
Introduction
- Purpose of Video: Clarify the distinction between Cohen's D and Hedges' G.
- Reason for Discussion: Both are often reported, and there's confusion regarding their differences.
- Recommended Reading: A paper by Rosnow and Rosenthal on effect size estimates.
Key Differences
- Formula for Hedges' G:
- Difference between two means divided by a pooled standard deviation (sample-based).
- Formula for Cohen's D:
- Difference between two means divided by a pooled Sigma (population-level standard deviation).
Conceptual Differences
- Standard Deviation:
- Hedges' G uses the sample standard deviation (n - 1).
- Cohen's D uses the population standard deviation (n).
Reporting Recommendations
- Preferred Reporting: Recommend reporting Hedges' G because typically, only sample standard deviations are accessible.
- Discrepancy in Use: Cohen's D is more frequently reported in literature despite the lack of access to population standard deviation.
Popularity and Misconceptions
- Frequency of Reporting:
- Hedges' G: 250 times in 2017 (Google Scholar).
- Cohen's D: 5,240 times in 2017.
- Potential Misreporting:
- Most studies likely do not have access to population data.
- Cohen's D is conceptualized in the context of power, relevant for population effect size.
Conclusion
- Recommendation: For reporting the standardized difference between two means, use Hedges' G unless population standard deviation is genuinely available.
- Reviewer's Perspective: Some reviewers may prefer Hedges' G over Cohen's D due to the typical availability of data.
Remember to check the paper by Rosnow and Rosenthal for more in-depth understanding of effect size estimates.