🤔

Meta-Ethics Overview

Jun 9, 2025

Introduction to Meta-Ethics

  • Meta-ethics asks foundational questions about the meaning and nature of “good,” “right,” and “wrong.”
  • Ethics includes three tiers: meta-ethics (big-picture analysis), normative ethics (how we should act), and applied ethics (applying principles to real-world issues).
  • Meta-ethics contrasts moral realism (morality is objective and discoverable) and moral anti-realism (morality is subjective or constructed).

Naturalism

  • Naturalism claims moral values can be observed in the natural world and are objective facts.
  • Aquinas’ natural moral law and Bentham’s utilitarianism are forms of naturalism.
  • Bentham: pleasure is good and pain is bad, as observed in human behavior.
  • Strengths: Makes morality objective and aligns with established ethical systems.
  • Weaknesses: Hume’s “is-ought” criticism—cannot derive moral values from facts; Moore’s “naturalistic fallacy”—cannot equate natural properties with goodness.

Intuitionism

  • Intuitionism (G.E. Moore): Goodness is simple, indefinable, and known by intuition, not by observation.
  • Moore: Good is like “yellow”—recognized but not definable.
  • Strengths: Morality is objective and self-evident, supported by some universally agreed moral values.
  • Weaknesses: People’s intuitions differ (suggesting subjectivity); may result from social conditioning; emotivists argue intuition is not verifiable or meaningful.

Emotivism

  • Emotivism (A.J. Ayer): Moral statements are expressions of emotion or preference, not factual claims.
  • Influenced by the verification principle: since moral claims aren’t analytically true or empirically verifiable, they are meaningless.
  • Strengths: Promotes tolerance, aligns with personal moral diversity, matches Hume’s fact-value distinction.
  • Weaknesses: Undermines the possibility of moral standards, not useful for moral decision-making or societal rules.

Are Meta-Ethics Most Important?

  • Arguments for: Knowing “what is good” is necessary before building normative or applied ethics.
  • Arguments against: Meta-ethics is abstract, disputed, and may be less practical than focusing on real-world moral decisions.

Key Terms & Definitions

  • Meta-ethics — analysis of the meaning and nature of ethical terms and concepts.
  • Moral realism — belief that moral statements refer to objective facts.
  • Moral anti-realism — belief that morality is not objective or discoverable.
  • Cognitivism — view that moral statements can be true or false.
  • Non-cognitivism — view that moral statements cannot be true or false.
  • Naturalism — the view that moral values are grounded in facts about the natural world.
  • Intuitionism — view that moral truths are self-evident and grasped intuitively.
  • Emotivism — theory that moral judgments simply express emotions or preferences.
  • Naturalistic fallacy — Moore’s claim that it’s a mistake to define “good” in terms of natural properties.