🤖

Humane AI Pin: A Wearable Review

Oct 7, 2024

Humane AI Pin Review Notes

Overview of the Product

  • Brand new wearable computer called the Humane AI Pin
  • Unique form factor, described as ultra futuristic
  • Costs $700 plus a subscription of $24/month for data and services
  • Standalone device, does not pair with smartphones
  • Includes features like a camera, microphone, touch pad, projector, and gesture control

Design and Hardware

  • Size: Comparable to a large watch
  • Build quality: Solid aluminum, dense feeling
  • Color options: Matte black (cheapest), white, and black/silver
  • Includes a "booster" for additional battery
  • Strong magnets for attachment to clothing
  • Comes with a reflective charging case and desktop charging puck
  • Various notification lights present for user interaction

Functionality

  • AI assistant available to answer questions
  • Multimodal interaction (voice, camera)
  • Features include:
    • Asking questions and receiving answers
    • Camera capabilities for taking pictures and short videos
    • Remembering user inputs for future reference
    • Translation features between languages

Performance Issues

  • Often slow response time due to reliance on Cloud processing
  • Frequently provides incorrect information
  • Battery life is inconsistent, requiring multiple charges throughout the day
  • Device tends to overheat
  • Heavy weight makes it uncomfortable to wear for extended periods

Limitations

  • Cannot set timers or alarms
  • Notifications are not easily visible
  • Poor quality in photos and videos
  • No app ecosystem available
  • Lacks integration with common services like Uber, Spotify, etc.
  • The device does not learn user preferences effectively, as it has no connection to a smartphone

Conclusion

  • Smartphones outperform the AI Pin in almost every function
  • The AI Pin represents an interesting but flawed attempt at a new type of wearable technology
  • Currently not recommended for purchase; the potential is recognized, but significant improvements are needed before it becomes a viable alternative to smartphones
  • Future updates are promised but lack a clear timeline
  • Overall, the product has a long way to go before it can compete effectively in the current tech landscape.