🌍

Understanding Power Distance in Cultures

Aug 12, 2024

Power Distance in Societal Culture

Introduction

  • Term Origin: Coined in the 1960s by Dutch sociopsychologist Mark Bulder.
  • Adoption: Borrowed by the speaker in the 1970s to describe differences among national societies.
  • Definition: Extent to which less powerful members of institutions expect and accept unequal power distribution.
    • Power distance is determined by people at the bottom, not the top.

Characteristics of Power Distance

Large Power Distance

  • Inequality: Seen as a normal part of society.
  • Superiors: Considered superior beings.
  • Morality: Power determines what is good and evil.
  • Law: Power is primary; rules follow.
  • Education: Respect is a key value taught to children.
  • Organization: Centralization is preferred.
  • Subordinate Relationship: Subordinates expect to be told what to do.

Small Power Distance

  • Inequality: Viewed as wrong; should be reduced.
  • Superiors: Hierarchies exist but do not define personal superiority.
  • Morality: Power must be used legitimately.
  • Law: Everyone is subject to the same rules of law.
  • Education: Independence is a key value taught to children.
  • Organization: Decentralization is preferred.
  • Subordinate Relationship: Subordinates expect to be consulted.

Measuring Power Distance

  • Power Distance Index (PDI): Measures relative power distances between societies on a scale from 0 to 100.
    • High PDI Scores: Closer to 100, indicating larger power distance (e.g., Russia, Mexico).
    • Low PDI Scores: Closer to 0, indicating smaller power distance (e.g., Denmark, USA).
  • Purpose: Allows for comparison of societal inequality.

Implications of Power Distance Index

High Power Distance

  • Income Inequality: Greater income inequality.
  • Social Classes: Smaller middle class; larger lower class.
  • Governance: Dictatorships or oligarchies are common.
  • Politics: Higher likelihood of violence; revolutions needed for change.
  • Executive Age: Older business executives.
  • Innovation: Supported by hierarchy; fewer spontaneous innovations.

Low Power Distance

  • Income Inequality: Less income inequality.
  • Social Classes: Larger middle class.
  • Governance: Legitimate use of power; separation of powers.
  • Politics: Peaceful conflict resolution; political evolution.
  • Executive Age: Younger business executives.
  • Innovation: Frequent spontaneous innovations; driven by mavericks or rebels.

Stability of Power Distance Scores

  • Transfer: Values transferred from parents to children; rarely change after childhood.
  • Research Findings: Small shift towards smaller power distances over generations, but relative positions of countries remain stable.
  • Historical Rooting: Differences often traceable to historical contexts; scores are stable over time.