Topic: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods for large language models: LoRA & QLoRA (LoRA 2.0)
Importance of Fine-Tuning
Pre-training
Involves processing a huge amount of text (~2 trillion tokens)
Model learns to predict the next word based on context
Fine-tuning
After pre-training, the base model fine-tuned further for various tasks
Instruct tuning: E.g., generating chat models like ChatGPT
Safety tuning: Prevents inappropriate behaviors
Domain fine-tuning: Specialize a model in specific fields like law or finance
Challenges with Full Parameter Fine-Tuning
Updates all model weights (parameters)
Requires substantial memory and computational resources
Limited by hardware constraints
LoRA: Low Rank Adaptation
Objectives
Solve memory and resource constraints during fine-tuning
Method
Track Changes Instead of Updating Weights Directly
Use two smaller matrices to represent changes
These matrices get multiplied to form a matrix of the same size as the model’s weight matrix
Increases efficiency by reducing the number of trainable parameters
Matrix Decomposition
Smaller matrices are size 1 (rank 1); few numbers multiplied result in a larger matrix
Precision sacrificed for efficiency
Higher ranks (e.g., rank 512) still significantly reduce the number of trainable parameters compared to full model size (e.g., fine-tuning 86 million out of 7 billion parameters)
Choosing Rank
Determining the Right Rank
Low rank: Sufficient for most tasks, especially if the task is within the model's prior knowledge
Higher rank: Needed for complex behaviors or tasks contradicting model's initial training
Empirical Results
Rank 8 to 256: Final performance isn’t widely affected
QLoRA: Even smaller memory usage by quantizing parameters while maintaining performance
QLoRA: Quantized LoRA
Method
Parameters reduced to smaller bit sizes (e.g., from 16-bit to 4-bit)
Clever method to recover original precision by using normal distribution characteristics
Advantages
Lesser memory usage compared to LoRA
Performance comparable to full-precision models
Best Practices
Hyperparameters
Alpha: Scaling factor of weight changes (Variable by rank)
Dropout: Prevents overfitting
10% for 7B & 13B models
5% for 33B & 65B models
Learning rate & Batch size: Detailed in papers
Implementation
Training all network layers essential for matching full-parameter fine-tuning performance
Consult empirical studies for hyperparameter tuning
Conclusion
LoRA and QLoRA provide efficient and effective methods for fine-tuning large language models
Explore Entrypoint AI for practical implementations