Comparison of Neorealism and Neoliberalism in International Relations

Jun 3, 2024

Comparison of Neorealism and Neoliberalism in International Relations

Introduction

  • Presenter: Noah Zerbe
  • Focus: Comparing neorealism and neoliberalism in US international relations.
  • Recommended to watch previous videos for foundational theories.

Areas of Agreement

  • Positivist Theories:
    • Both believe in objective laws governing the international system.
    • Systematic analysis can uncover these laws.
  • Game Theory: Utilized to understand state behavior dynamics.
  • State-Centric Theories:
    • State is the most important actor.
    • States behave rationally in pursuit of national interest.
  • Condition of Anarchy: Accepted by both as shaping state behavior, unlike classical liberals.

Key Differences

National Interest

  • Neoliberalism:
    • Focus on absolute gains.
    • Broad conception including economic well-being, military power, and security.
  • Neorealism:
    • Focus on relative gains due to security dilemma.
    • Narrow view centered on military power and security.

Nature of Anarchy

  • Neorealism:
    • Anarchy is all-encompassing and unchanging.
    • Leads to a self-help environment, making cooperation difficult.
    • International organizations seen as tools for dominant states.
  • Neoliberalism:
    • Anarchy can be mitigated by processes and institutions.
    • International organizations play a central role in cooperation.
    • Examples: UN, EU, WTO influencing state behavior.

Focus of Analysis

  • Neorealism:
    • Issues like national security, war, arms races, conflict.
  • Neoliberalism:
    • Issues like political economy, human rights, international organizations.

Use of Force in Foreign Policy

  • Neorealists:
    • Not always supportive of force; dependent on clear national security interest.
    • Example: Opposition to Iraq War (2003) and Vietnam War.
  • Neoliberals:
    • May support force for democratization, human rights violations (e.g., Responsibility to Protect).
    • Example: Support for Iraq War (2003) on grounds of terrorism, WMDs, and democratization.

Conclusion

  • Summary of neorealism and neoliberalism comparison.
  • Encouragement to leave questions for further discussion.
  • End of presentation.

Thank you for watching!