I think it's maybe the most controversial section in your book. Here's a quote. What must be grasped is that Yon Hus's execution was not a violation of medieval Roman Catholic theology, but its expression. This sounds shocking to modern ears, but it is true to history. So, you can feel free to elaborate on that as well, but that's where I was going, of course, with the reference to the Council of Constants. Yeah. Yeah. the the the basic concern I have in my heart here is as someone who wants to be charitable and generous and knows that it's easy to caricature history. I went into my research about some of these topics expecting that the truth would be sort of more complicated and the good guys and bad guys wouldn't be so clearly discernable. But sometimes you study history. That's pretty obvious. And and you're confronted with evil that is so I'm going to use the word abusive. Um it it is so abusive both financially abusive. Indulgences I regard to be a form of financial abuse as they were functioning especially as they were functioning in the late medieval west. Um, basically this was a way of um, manipulating the leoty of the church uh, financially and I explain that more in the book but also just physical abuse, physical violence and I was I'm I'm a pretty sensitive person about those things. You know, anytime I talk about the martyrs I I end up getting choked up and I don't even fully know why a psychologist could explain that more than I could. Um I I just really touches me the the the bravery of men and women who have been physically uh assaulted for their faith in Christ. Yan Hus is one of my great personal heroes and I regard him to be simply a godly man. Just plain and simple pious, godly uh and and and theologically correct in his fundamental concerns against the Roman Catholic hierarchy of his time and oh unbelievably courageous in his articulation of that. And I regard his opponents who tried and executed him by burning him alive to be treacherous and dishonest and um malevolent. And uh so I I think the reason I go into that in this book is I really think it's easy to be naive and think, "Oh, it wasn't that bad." You know, it didn't it wasn't really that bad. It was kind of some blame on both sides. And I think people need to understand just how dire the situation was. Um people will not appreciate why a reform effort within the one true church which is what I think Protestantism was an effort at reform not a creating a new church but reforming the church why that had to take place in the form of separation from the reigning power namely the papacy in the west uh unless they understand how much uh sin and violence was being uh defended at the highest levels of leadership and so when I say Puss's execution was an expression of Catholic theology. I document that in the book in terms of the medieval theology of two swords. There's the the temporal sword and the spiritual sword. And basically to to put it plainly, the Roman Catholic Church claimed authority over the civil magistrate to uh and claimed a theology of the extermination of heretics. So basically, heresy is the worst thing. It's worse than sin and it needs to be stamped out. The body of sin must be put to death. That's a quote from the sermon the day whose was burned from Romans 6. That's how they applied Romans 6. The body of sin must be put to death. So they they taught that heresy must be exterminated. And uh the the cruelty of it uh is is staggering. And so uh not out of uh I have no axe to grind really. I I just want people to know what really happened. I I we need to know. We need to have historical information and that's not the things I'm saying right now are not really in dispute. They're not really um uh you know the scholarship is not 50/50 on these things. Uh they really happened and and I just think we need to know that today.