Understanding Social Darwinism and Its Impact

Sep 11, 2024

Social Darwinism (1865 - 1900s)

Definition & Context

  • Social Darwinism used to promote competition among individuals and groups.
  • Opposed intervention in the natural human order, emphasizing human struggle for existence.
  • Influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection (survival of the fittest).

Political and Social Implications

  • Advocated for laissez-faire capitalism, political conservatism, imperialism, and racism.
  • Discouraged reforms and governmental intervention in social issues.
  • Belief that wealth and social status stem from evolved personal characteristics.

Key Figures

  • Herbert Spencer:

    • Argued against social programs aiding the poor.
    • Believed in the natural order of competition; the "fit" survive.
  • William Graham Sumner:

    • Liberal social scientist supporting Spencer's views.
    • Asserted that the most capable (talent, brains, hard work) rise to the top.
  • Andrew Carnegie:

    • Applied Darwin's ideas to society, advocated for a free market without government interference.
    • Embodied the rags-to-riches narrative, owner of Carnegie Steel Company.
    • Believed in the survival of the fittest in economic terms.
  • Other Influential Figures:

    • J.P. Morgan: Financier who supported social Darwinism.
    • John D. Rockefeller: Founder of Standard Oil, viewed business growth as survival of the fittest.
    • Cornelius Vanderbilt: Built wealth through ferry services, exemplified the principles of social Darwinism.

Core Beliefs of Social Darwinists

  • Weaker members of species should naturally die off, only stronger genes survive.
  • Applied this belief to humans, opposing government aid and regulation (e.g., child labor laws).
  • Social Darwinists viewed their wealth and power as evidence of superiority in evolution.

Summary

  • Social Darwinists believed that their success was a result of being superior beings in the evolution process.
  • The ideology led to widespread opposition against social reforms designed to help the less fortunate.