📊

YouTube View Buying Methods Comparison

Jun 10, 2025

Overview

The video tests six methods of buying YouTube views to evaluate their effectiveness, costs, analytics, and impact on organic channel growth, ranking each on a tier list based on key performance metrics.

Bot and Click Farm Views

  • Bot views are automated, low-cost, violate YouTube's guidelines, and yield minimal organic reach or loyal subscribers.
  • Click farm views are slightly more expensive, involve real people, but still result in low engagement and subscriber conversion.
  • Both methods risk channel penalties and produce poor retention and clickthrough rates.
  • Cost per subscriber and watch hour for these methods is extremely high, making them unviable for genuine growth.
  • Most traffic was direct/external, not from YouTube's algorithmic promotion.

YouTube Promotions (Beta)

  • YouTube’s built-in promotions tool allows internal ad campaigns targeting by country and language.
  • For $100, the campaign delivered 1,580 views, 240 subscribers, and 300,000 impressions at $0.063 per view.
  • Cost per subscriber was low ($0.41), but watch hours and retention remained poor.
  • Promotions had minimal measurable impact on organic algorithm growth.

Google Ads – Untargeted Instream

  • Google Ads offers more advanced, flexible campaigns, reaching 5.4 million views for $88,000.
  • Typical cost per view is around $0.011, with $0.39 per watch hour, and $10 per subscriber.
  • Minimal influence on YouTube’s organic traffic; no significant evidence that ads "kill" organic views.
  • Audience quality is low due to limited targeting (mainly country/language), resulting in low channel value.

Google Ads – Targeted Instream

  • Adding targeting by country and keywords results in higher cost per view ($0.016), $1.42 per watch hour, and $35.84 per subscriber.
  • Attracts better-quality viewers, more relevant to the channel's goals, but at a premium.

Google Ads – Infeed (Discovery) Ads

  • Infeed ads place videos natively within YouTube, reducing friction for engagement.
  • Costs are highest: $0.06 per view, $0.95 per watch hour, with high subscriber costs.
  • Useful for driving engagement, but expensive for growth.

Tier List and Comparative Results

  • Bot views: Cheapest but illicit and ineffective (C or D tier).
  • Click farm views: More expensive, equally ineffective (D tier).
  • YouTube Promotions: Good for cheap subscribers, limited for views and hours (B tier).
  • Google Ads Untargeted Instream: Cheap for views/hours, poor quality (A tier).
  • Google Ads Targeted Instream: Pricier but higher-quality viewers (B tier).
  • Google Infeed: Most expensive but removes engagement friction (B tier).

Key Takeaways

  • Cheapest views come from bots (not recommended); second cheapest via untargeted Google Ads.
  • Best cost per subscriber is via YouTube Promotions.
  • None of the methods significantly trigger organic algorithmic growth.
  • Organic growth via algorithm remains the most effective long-term strategy.

Decisions

  • Ranked each view-buying method by effectiveness, cost, and compliance.
  • Determined organic growth should remain the primary focus for channel success.