🗣️

Exploring Language's Impact on Thought

Feb 25, 2025

Introducing Sociolinguistics: Language and Society

Key Questions Addressed

  • What is the relationship between language and thought?
  • Does language determine the way people think and view the world?
  • Does language shape the way people think and see the world?

Central Issues in Psycholinguistics

  • Relationship between language, thought, and culture.
  • Is language necessary for thought?

Main Views on Thought and Language

  • Speech is necessary for thought.
  • Language is necessary for thought.
  • Language determines the way we think and see the world.
  • Language relatively affects the way we think and see the world.

Thought as Behavior

  • Thought viewed as behavior derived from speech production.
  • Thought defined as subvocal speech or behavior.
  • Thinking equated to speaking internally.
  • Reference: Steinberg & Sciarini, 2006.

Speech Comprehension vs Production

  • Children can comprehend speech and think without producing speech.
  • Speech comprehension develops before speech production in children.
  • Speech production not necessary for thought.
  • Reference: Steinberg & Sciarini, 2006.

Language as Necessary for Thought

  • Language system, including vocabulary, necessary for thought.
  • Broader view, encompassing both speech production and comprehension.
  • Argument against thought without language.
  • Reference: Sapir, 1921; Steinberg & Sciarini, 2006.

Multilingualism and Thought Systems

  • Multilingual individuals might form multiple thought systems.
  • Different languages forming different systems of thought.

Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Linguistic Determinism

  • Language structure determines thought, behavior, and worldview.
  • Language acts as a filter to reality.

Linguistic Relativity

  • Culture, via language, affects thought and worldview.

Examples of Language Differences

  • Grammatical and lexical differences among languages illustrate different worldviews.
  • Example: English vs. Spanish terminology for 'legs' and 'eating'.
  • Example: Honorifics in Japanese, logical relations in Kiriwina.

Whorf's Contrast

  • Hopi vs. Standard Average European (SAE) languages.
  • Different orientations towards time and space.
  • Implications on worldview and perception.

Testing the Hypotheses

  • Tests show variability among languages supports linguistic relativity.
  • Universal and unique aspects among languages.

Discussion

  • Encouragement to compare grammatical and lexical elements of native vs. other languages as per linguistic theories.

References

  • Steinberg, D. & Sciarini, V. (2006). An Introduction to Psycholinguistics.
  • Hill, J.H. (1988). Language, Culture, and World View.
  • Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An introduction to sociolinguistics.

Additional Resources