Lecture Notes on Acts Chapter 1 (Verses 12-26)

Introduction

• Text: Acts chapter 1, starting at verse 12.
• Context: Early days of the apostolic company after Jesus’ ascension.
• Focus: Replacement of Judas Iscariot.

Return to Jerusalem

• Disciples returned to Jerusalem from the Mount of Olivet (v. 12).
• The distance is approximately a Sabbath day's journey (about 2/3 of a mile).

Upper Room

• They gathered in an upper room (v. 13) where key disciples were present:
  • Peter, James, John, Andrew, Philip, Thomas, Bartholomew, Matthew, James (son of Alphaeus), Simon Zelotes, and Judas (brother of James).
  • Others present include women, Mary (mother of Jesus), and His brothers.
• They devoted themselves to prayer and supplication (v. 14).

Peter’s Address

• Peter stood up among the 120 disciples (v. 15).
• He mentioned the fulfillment of scripture regarding Judas (v. 16):
  • Judas was a guide for those who arrested Jesus.
  • He had a part in the ministry but fell into betrayal.

Judas’ Fate

• Judas purchased a field with the reward of betrayal (30 pieces of silver) and died in it (v. 18).
• The field was known as “Keldama” (Field of Blood).
• Prophecy about Judas’ desolation is quoted from Psalms (v. 20).

Criteria for Replacement

• New apostle must be a witness of Jesus’ ministry from the baptism of John to His ascension (vv. 21-22).
• Two candidates: Joseph (Barsabbas) and Matthias (v. 23).

Selection Process

• They prayed for guidance (v. 24).
• Lots were cast, and Matthias was chosen (v. 26).

Key Points on Judas

• Judas was a legitimate apostle who performed miracles (e.g., casting out demons).
• His betrayal was known and foretold in scripture (referenced Psalms).

Harmonization of Accounts

• Discussion on the methods of Judas’ death (hanging vs. falling) and the purchase of the field.
• Suggestion: Temple authorities bought the field with Judas’ money after he threw it down.

Use of Lots in Decision Making

• The casting of lots to choose a replacement is likened to the division of land among tribes in Israel.
• This reflects God’s sovereignty and the responsibility of human actions.
• Importance of recognizing God’s hand in decision-making processes.

Conclusion

• Reflection on God's sovereignty amidst human wickedness.
• Encouragement to trust God’s plans and seek His guidance in difficult decisions.