Transcript for:
یزید اور اس کی خلافت کے معاملات

Consider the companions of Yazid as good or bad, those who have pledged allegiance have pledged allegiance to whoever has the power, Yazid has the one who is powerful, that is what the ruler in Islam calls him, and there are clear authentic hadiths of Bukhari Muslim that when a person Let him become the ruler and kill whoever stands against him. Whatever it is, those who pledged allegiance to Yazid did not argue with him whether this is good or what is wicked. They said that allegiance is powerful. If you don't do it, then he will kill you for the crime of rebellion, then the Islamic government will be divided, and the blood of Muslims will be shed, so brother, whatever is good or bad, there is no question of good or bad. The third false defense they make is that they say yes The Companions had pledged allegiance to Yazid , so what is your problem? The Companions had is a hadith number 4827. Marwan bin Hukm is a member of Madinah. Hazrat Muawiya, may Allah be pleased with him, is giving the announcement of governor bin in the sermon. That Allah Ta'ala has taught this to Ameerul Momineen, he is in the wider interest of the ummah, that is, O my dear compatriots, he nominates his son as caliph after him in the wider interest of the ummah . He did not quote the next sentences, they were very strict, but what happened after that, he copied what the next sentences were, I will tell you later. It happened and he said something there, what did he say, then Imam Bukhari skipped it, then Imam Bukhari quoted the next sentences from him, who found out that it was something that made him feel angry, Marwa said. Arrest him, catch him, he immediately entered the Prophet's Mosque, which was Aisha's room, where his sister was present, and these are the siblings in the case of Pakistan . Ayesha's mother was also his mother. Abd al-Rahman bin Abi Bakr's brothers and sisters went to him. Now, obviously, Marwan could not do this. The Muslims had to protest again. He said, "O son of Abu Bakr, a verse was revealed about you in the Qur'an, didn't this disbeliever say that my parents who tell me that I will be resurrected after death, these are the stories of the next people, son of Abu Bakr. A verse was revealed about you in the Qur'an , repentance, repentance, these are the servants of Banu Umayyah , these are the blasphemers, the caliphs of the Rashidun. The verses of the Qur'an were not revealed, except that the verses of Surah Noor were revealed in my procession , when I was falsely accused. By the grace of Allah, Hafiz Ibn Kathir quoted the verse number 17 of Surah Al-Ahqaf, which Marwan quoted wrongly, in its context, all those Turks have been collected in one place, so the three Barelvi Deobandi Ahl al-Hadith will not have any objection. The point was that at that time, Marwan said that Abu Bakr had also nominated Umar as the caliph, or Hazrat Muawiya wanted to make his son Yazid. Because it is obvious that he said that it was meant to be made, then they are making me, or if they did not make me, then who is taking the example from the east and throwing it to the west, and what he said , did he say something? That your Commander of the Faithful, Muawiya, has directly said that he is not following the path of Abu Bakr and Umar, he is following the path of Qaiser and Kasri. He said, "Take hold of them." There were other words of Ama Aisha in the room which Imam Bukhari did not quote. They were that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said about you, Marwan, "A curse on the order, a curse on his children, behind your father's back." It was when the Prophet of Allah had cursed both the father and the son . Tell me when the situation is such that the sons of Hazrat Abu Bakr also had to save their lives by the force of the sword. Four years before his death, a servant killed his son Yazid. If he is taking the oath of allegiance, then you will say that the Companions have sworn allegiance. They say that Ibn Umar had sworn allegiance. Sir, he was explaining to our students. If Ibn Umar was explaining at that time, then who was he explaining to the people of his level, the Companions and the Companions . He said, " What is left now is to break Yazid's allegiance to the people of Medina." Ibn Umar went to meet them and said, "I have come to tell you the hadith that the Caliph who died without the allegiance of the time died the death of ignorance." Yes, since Ibn Umar had taken the oath of allegiance, he had also forced him to do it in the manner in which he had done it . It was not done by himself, so at that time he was in Jahiliyyah. Logically, his statement was not correct. Otherwise, he himself would have been under the influence of this fatwa. We are with Abdullah Ibn Muti' and the rest of the people . Look at what the Banu Umayyah did with Ibn Umar. It is in Sahih Bukhari. He was wounded in the foot while in the state of Ihram during Hajj by a poisoned spear. When he came to visit them, these are the words of Bukhari . You have given permission in which there is no permission . This hadith is present in the collection of Zawaid. Imam Hashimi, who is the teacher of Ibn Hajar Askrani, said that its chain of transmission is authentic in the collection of Zawaid. No regrets above. I did not do anything like that except one thing that I did not fight with Hazrat Ali against the rebel group against the rebel group which I should have done which rebel group that in Bukhari. Ammar, if a rebellious group kills you, then he will call them to Allah and Paradise, that group will call you to Hell, that is, Hazrat Ali's group is the group that the Prophet (peace be upon him) called to Paradise, and their opponents to Hell. The Jamaat did not say that it is calling to Hell because it opposes the Caliphate of the Muslims. This is a separate topic. There are several of my videos. Watch the previous video. Why did Karbala take place last Muharram? Look at this. It is a very clear hadith presenting a one-sided case. Those who had created so much commotion over the foundation of Ibn Umar, Ibn Umar is ashamed of his old deeds in the last time and they are saying that Ibn Umar had pledged allegiance to Yazid, who was the opponent of Ibn Umar. They were also Companions and followers, they do not respect their opinion, that is, sweet sweet hip hip te koda koda tho tho. Eight Three Zero When Hazrat Umar performed the last Hajj, after that he did not get lucky for the next year, so there in Mina, someone conveyed the word to Hazrat Umar that people are prophesying here that when Umar dies, we will be so-and-so. Hazrat Umar was so angry that he said, "I will give a sermon right here, that they have already decided who will be the caliph without the advice of the Muslims." Such people have come, you should go to the Prophet's Mosque and give a sermon. This was discussed in front of a few people. Please do not make it public . At the same time, I wanted to upload the clip on YouTube by replying to Khair Madina Sharif, Ibn Abbas says that I was so close to the member that he was touching my knee and I was saying to my colleagues that Hazrat Umar was too big to give a crack. In anger, he gave a long sermon in which there were also words that the manner in which Abu Bakr's caliphate was held was a catastrophic condition, and it should not be used as an argument in the future. He should have been chosen, but Saad Ibn Ubada and the rest of the issues that happened in Saqifa Bani Saizda are a separate topic. He said that this will not be a debate in the future. After consulting with the Companions, the Companions said to nominate you, after that there was a consultation, it was not imposed by force, then Hazrat Umar formed a six-member committee because there were no better people than these six. These six are present in Bukhari. The people are those with whom the Messenger of Allah was pleased until his death , then Sayyiduna Umar (RA) said, " Remember not to make Hazrat Abu Bakr's caliphate a proof. Whenever someone is chosen as a caliph without the advice of the Muslims, that is the end of it." There will be killings and killings. They say that there was killings and killings. Yes, Yazid was the caliph, then Hazrat Hussain rebelled. I swear to God that the caliphate is not established. It was forbidden to say that the shrines have been martyred. If the shrine will not be martyred, then it was forbidden to build it. In Muslim Sharif, I forbid you to cook the graves, to build buildings on the graves, and to sit on the graves as neighbors. It is also forbidden to sit. Therefore, this concept is completely clear. False defense number four . They say yes, Yazid was a tabi. And whoever saw my seer, i.e. saw the Sahabi, and he became a Tabi, the fire of Hell will not touch him, so they say, "Yes, Yazid, he has forgiven, he has forgiven, and Hajjaj Ibn Yusuf has also forgiven, he is not a Tabieen." The majority of the false narrators are among their followers. By law, they were followers. It is obvious that they were the Kharijites. Who were the followers? They were the people of the Qibla. No, he is not a disbeliever. He was asked if he is a hypocrite . He said that he is not a hypocrite. He is a hypocrite. He mentions Allah very little. He prays so long. There is a group that has rebelled against us, there is a group that has come out of us, so the Kharijites are also followers, but it is in the Musnad of Ahmad that the Prophet, peace be upon him, said that the Kharijites are the dogs of hell, why are they like this because of their actions? Hajjaj, who is the killer of so many companions , you will call him Tabi, Tabi is legal, he was obviously the governor of Muslims, but look at Muslim Sharif. It was said that there will be a liar among Banu Saqif and a tyrant . He threw them in the graveyard and called his mother, who was the daughter of Hazrat Abu Bakr, and said to Asma, even older than Aisha, "Look what I have done to your son." She said, "You have ruined my son's world, my son." He has ruined your hereafter, a cruel person, this is a Muslim Sharif, Maulana is not Sharif, so Hajj is also a Tabi, the fire of hell will not touch him, neither do they know the Qur'an, nor do they understand the Sunnah, nor do they know jurisprudence. Only one Banu Umayyad. Even if they have to deny the Qur'an and the Sunnah, they have to fabricate false traditions, they have to fabricate what are clear hadiths, they have to deny them. Almost 800 years ago, Imam Ibn Juzi, may God have mercy on him, died in 597 Hijri. He is also a student of Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani, who died in 561 Hijri. He has a great position among the muhaddiths of Ibn Juzi . Two hundred years have passed before Ibn Taymiyyah and he is also considered a great muhaddith . This is also a sign that this is a forged hadith. Some signs of forged hadiths have been mentioned. One of them is said to be in the glory of Hazrat Muawiya, so understand that this is a forged hadith. Now this is a great muhadith. There was a nasbi in his time, Abd al-Mughith, he wrote a treatise on the virtues of Yazid, so Ibn Juzi was angry. He wrote a book which is considered authentic by the scholars. It is also called Al-Ard al-Mutasab al-Anid al-Mu'ani Min Dhimm Yazid. This book is being written in response to this bigoted and obstinate person who considers it wrong to call Yazid bad and forbids it. At that time, there was a Yazidi, Abd al-Mughith, in response to his rebuttal. The nature of these people has been cleared when an argument was taken that Yazid was not He is the son of Hazrat Muawiya and there is a tradition in Tirmidhi for Hazrat Muawiya, O Allah, make him Hadi and Mahdi. He said that he had made Yazid the rightful caliph. He said that this is a fake tradition. Then he argued about the tradition. I have proved it with Bukhari Muslim. He said that even if someone believes this hadith to be authentic, then there is no guarantee that this prayer of the Prophet (peace be upon him) has been accepted because many of the prayers of the Prophet (peace be upon him) have been answered by Allah. In Bukhari Muslim, you had prayed that my Ummah should not fight among themselves. Allah Almighty returned it. He said, "What is the guarantee?" Then Ibn Juzi wrote such a strong sentence. This supplication would have been accepted in favor of Hazrat Muawiyah, according to you, if this tradition is proven, then Hazrat Muawiyah fought against Hazrat Ali in the Battle of Safin, and it must be habitual and material that the Caliph stood against the time, and he struck a big blow. Then he also quoted the words of Ahmad bin Hanbal when he was asked what is his position about Yazid, he said that he is the one who did what he asked and what he said to the people of Madinah, looted their wealth and killed them. Did the student say that the son of the Sahabi should have Hadith taken? He said Hadith, not even a single Hadith should be taken from him. That is why, look at the Hadith collection . There are hadiths of the children of the Companions. There was a period with Hazrat Ali in between the governor and the next 20 years of full rule. After that, he remained the ruler for 20 years. After peace, 40 years, whose father was the ruler of the Muslims, his son did not narrate a single hadith. And the hadiths have not quoted it, because Ahmad bin Hanbal says: What hadith will you take from it? Then the student asked: When Yazid did injustice to the people of Madinah, who were the people with him, the people of Syria, who are we the rich? Syria says these were Syrians, it was a province that created all this commotion, so this book has been translated into Urdu language. He is a Deobandi scholar. He translated it. I have introduced this book many times. Yes, this book is available, its PDF is also available on our website, someone made a PDF, so we have uploaded it, but you should also have the hard copy, they can order it. We will share the title page of the book with you. It is related to reading the book and there are many other things in it which will be beneficial for you, God willing. Yes, if Hazrat Muawiyah created his son, then what happened to Hazrat Ali? He also created his son. It is a lie . He said to Ali, because he lived for a few days after being wounded, that you nominate someone as your caliph. It is said that Hazrat Ali nominated Hasan Ibn Ali as the caliph after him. He was chosen by the Companions in consultation. In this regard, Sheikh Albani has taken a tradition that the first person of my Ummah who will change my Sunnah will be from Banu Umayyah. And Sheikh Al-Albani also knows what has been written that he will be the person who will make the caliphate a monarchy, then look, then who is the first person of the Banu Umayyad who made the caliphate a monarchy ? Umar is not from Banu Aadi, not from Banu Umayyah, Hazrat Uthman is from Banu Umayyah, but he did not make his son, after him Hazrat Ali is from Banu Hashim, after him six months from Hasan Ibn Ali, then Hazrat Muawiya (may Allah be pleased with him). He is from Banu Umayyad, he made his son, we have told you before, Sheikh Albani, who was the great Muhaddith of Saudi Arabia, Imam Bukhari of this era, the Ahl al-Hadith, Deoband , and Barelvi also believe him. He pointed and said that this will be the person who will change the caliphate to the monarchy, the first person in my ummah who will change my Sunnah. The fifth false defense is fixed. They say yes, Hazrat Ali, who is his own son, Muhammad bin Hanafia, has praised Yazid greatly. We ask where it is written. They say it is written in history . And 95 percent of them are in favor of their father They are against each other, but it will be difficult to prove faith. If we present references to Tabari's history, then talk to the hadith. Yes, there is no such thing in the hadith . This is why we are crying, but it is in the history. Yes, we say that the history you are presenting is the same. Read it in full. Ghate will fit. It is known in this tradition that Abdullah Ibn Muti is with the companion of Muhammad Ibn Hanafiyah, who is a follower who is the son of Hazrat Ali. He is told by a woman named Hanafiyah that his brother Hussain was martyred. Yazid became the ruler, why don't you stay? Everyone said that some people from the people of Madinah have come from Syria . So Muhammad bin Hanafia said, "No, no, as long as I stay with Yazid, I have found him to be bound by prayer and a follower of the Sunnah." Everything has been acted out to show that, in fact, he is a drunkard, he is the one who violates the Book and the Sunnah. Now this was the whole tradition. While the Sahabi is saying that he is a drunkard, Tariq al-Salah is mocking the Book and Sunnah, now tell me, if the words of the Sahabi and the Tabi'i conflict, whose words will be accepted, they copied half the hadith, that is why our teacher Sheikh Zubair sahib He regularly discussed this tradition in Fatawi Ilmia and said that if you accept this tradition as authentic, then you have to accept that Yazid did not even pray, he was also a drunkard and used to break the Book and Sunnah, transgressing his orders. He used to say that it is better to get rid of this tradition. He said, in my opinion, this whole tradition is not proven, because if you take the whole tradition and then take half of it, then it is not accepted . A writ was filed saying that Muhammad Bin Hanafia praised you, meet him and explain the full praise, then it will be known that the Sahabi are doing Sahabi, then you left the Sahabi, false defense number six . It was Shiaan Ali himself who killed Yazid 's head . Wow, it was killed by the Kufis . What did the Punjab Police do? Punjab Police is under the federal government. If it does good work, it will go to the federal government's account . Those who came with an army of 22,000 were Kufis in Karbala, but they were within this government. They were not the Kufis who wrote the letters. They were the companions and followers of Salman Ibn Sard, whose hadith is narrated by Bukhari and Muslim. He saw two servants fighting and said, "I know a word like this. If they read it, the devil will be away from them, and their anger will cool down. Awzu-Billah Min-ul-Shaitan Allerjim. This is a hadith of Bukhari Bukhari Muslim. Sulaiman Ibn Sard was the man who told Hazrat Hussain that he had died and left behind a younger one, and the word he used was the one we use for the opponent of Moses. An older one has died and left a younger one in his place. Such harsh words at that time because of the fear of Ubaidullah ibn Ziyad, those people could not leave. Muslim ibn Aqeel was killed. He was removed from but later he led the movement of Tawabun and they were all martyred and then Mukhtar Thaqfi did he also kill Ubaidullah Ibn Ziyad ? Ibn Ziyad, the governor of Kufa, who belonged to Yazid, was presented in a bowl. The curse of Allah, the curse of the angels of Allah, the curse of all the cursers who martyred the Ahl al-Bayt so cruelly . Anas Ibn Malik was standing next to him. He was old. He was 90 plus . He said that Hussain Ibn Ali was the most similar to the Messenger of Allah. This is Bukhari. The words are in the same hadith, Imam Bukhari has written on the head of Hussain, peace be upon him, the blessed head of Hussain, peace be upon him has been written. It is written in Arabic. Open it and see. It is also written in Arabic in Islam 360. It is written in Urdu. They don't believe it, they say, man, what have they done? I said, it's good , there's no need to change it. Leave it as it is so we can show listen later.com is a huge website with books of hadith written in Arabic عليه السلام written in Urdu رضي الله عنه a sectarian thing to keep the faction alive. So Ubaidullah Ibn Ziyad, in front of whom Hazrat Hussain's head was cut off, was a Kufi, but he was a governor on behalf of the Syrians, so it can be said that the Kufis killed the oppressors. Who had invited Hazrat Hussain there for a political struggle and Hazrat Hussain did not go to fight, he was going with his wife and children for a political struggle, the end of which was to be Qiyam Hussain, but he was martyred before that. That's why they changed their route. What they say is that they were going towards Damascus. It is completely false to give their hands to Yazid. They changed their route because they found out that Muslim bin Aqeel was martyred. They will not allow me to reach Kufa, so I will deceive them and go by another route, but they had so much army, they were also in danger that Hussain Ibn Ali would not change his route, so they also camped near Karbala. It was said that if he comes from this route, we will catch those who are making these maps and telling you. Be afraid, servants of Allah, you are making up lies and starting to attribute false defense number seven, which is the same. They say Hussain (peace be upon him) had set three conditions. Yes, in Karbala, he himself said to Ubaidullah Ibn Ziyad that let me go to Yazid. Glory be to Allah, if this had been done, Ubaydullah Ibn Ziyad would have fought and was saying, Yazid Sahib, what your father could not do with the force of the sword for four years, see, I have done it, and how much Yazid would have rewarded him that my father Yes, those who could not do the job of not being able to take the pledge of allegiance to Hussain, you have taken it. It is obvious that after this the rule of Banu Umayyad was to be legitimized. The problem was that until Hazrat Hussain did not pledge allegiance, the existing government would not be legitimized. It is above the force of the sword, so it is reasonable to believe that Ubaydullah Ibn Ziyad let this opportunity go. Another condition was that I should not be allowed to enter any border of the Muslims. Send me to the area where I will wage jihad against the infidels. At that time, there was no jihad against the infidels. There was a civil war with them . This is also completely fraudulent. So on the way I knew that Muslim bin Aqeel had been martyred and what would happen to me. They knew the hadiths that exist about me. This is the book from which they presented Ansaab al-Ashraf, the book of Imam Blay, and they say these three conditions. He is present and he is a cleric of the Deobandis . It was clear yesterday, yesterday, did you remember, I didn't even read the Quran, I said things that the tyrant said, things have to be done on the feet of Chak. Allah Al-Hasani. He said that these three conditions were Ansab-ul-Ashraf , which is a book . Although the Fazail Sahaba narrated this hadith in the book from Ansaab al-Ashraf and wrote that its chain of transmission is correct up to Halal bin Yasab, but they did not confirm whether the incident of Halal bin Yasab was in Karbala or not . Before his death, he wrote an article in Fatawi Ilmiya that the book of Imam Bila is not proven, but why did he do this, I will tell you, he did not tell me . Then he said, Ali Bhai, if we accept this book as authentic, then there are other traditions in it, what will we do with them? I have started to present three traditions. Don't use this as an accusatory answer, cut him a clip. Those throat-splitting clerics cut my clip that if you want to believe the book Ansaab-ul-Ashraf with three conditions, then it is written in it that Yazid's father Regarding his coffin being in the fire of hell, yes, it is written about Yazid's father that when you see him climbing on my member, kill him and then the famous tradition of which some end was captured. He did not give the purpose of this tradition. That tradition is also fully written in this book. If you want to accept this book as authentic, then see what happens to you. That tradition was in Musnad al-Bazar with a valid chain of transmission in Majma' al-Zawaid. That the Prophet ( peace be upon him) cursed three people, a camel was passing in front of him. The curse of Allah is also on him, this tradition ends. Now, what will be the result of this tradition in Musnad al-Bazar, Jama'at al-Zawa'id, unless it is told that he was carrying wine on top of this camel. They were carrying hashish, they were carrying hashish, why was it cursed, who were those servants, the Muhadditheen did not mention the names of these servants in their books, it was obvious that it was going to be difficult . But this tradition exists in its place, it is called the hadith of the camel that curses the one who is sitting on the camel and the one who holds the mahar . These servants were actually cursed. If anyone wants to believe this book as authentic, it is a book with three conditions . Yes, the camel's head was in the hands of Yazid's father and the one driving the camel was Yazid's uncle . That they will cut the clip again, I pointed out to you that Yazid's grandfather was sitting on the camel, the mahar was in his father's hand and the one driving was the uncle, you all know the name, otherwise write it yourself in the comments of our students. We will give the names of three servants and then we will accept this tradition as authentic, that's why Sheikh Zubair Sahib said that this book is not proven by Imam Baladri. So please mention the three cursed people, then yes, there are three conditions, here are the three people on whom the Prophet of God has cursed, then obviously it will come in parallel and not only cursed that the coffin of Yazid's father is in the fire of hell. All these traditions will tell you to kill Yazid's father when you look at him, so it is better to get rid of Ansaab al-Ashrab. The position of our teacher is right for us. But the dangers associated with it which is the next version is even more dangerous, it is better to get rid of this book because these are all fake books and we know that all your things are fake. There is no correct one, but you discovered it with great difficulty