Lecture on the Concept of "Conversion" in Christianity and Judaism

Introduction

• Focus on Acts 3:19 where Peter calls for repentance and turning to God.
• Comparison of different Bible translations:
  • KJV: "Repent ye therefore, and be converted."
  • CJB: "Turn to God."
• Exploration of the term "convert" and its implications.

Conversion vs. Turning

• Convert:
  • Implies a complete change in form or nature.
  • Suggests becoming something entirely different.
• Turn:
  • Implies changing direction, not becoming something else.
• The Greek word "epistrefo" aligns more with the Hebrew "shav," meaning "to turn back."

Historical and Theological Context

• The KJV choice to use "convert" has roots in the Catholic Church's agenda:
  • Implied Jews needed to stop being Jews to become Christians.
  • Christianity viewed as a gentiles-only religion.
• Christian doctrine often invisibly influenced by these historical views.

Words and Translations

• Importance of understanding original meanings in Biblical texts:
  • Words change meanings over time.
  • Translations may misrepresent original intent due to evolving language.
• Importance of historical and cultural context in understanding scripture.

Misunderstandings and Agendas

• Some ancient Hebrew concepts misunderstood or mistranslated.
• Example: "Conversion" vs. "Call" in Acts and Apostle Paul's teachings:
  • Krister Stendahl: Advocated for using the term "call" instead of "convert."
  • Suggested that Peter and Paul did not abandon Judaism.

Implications for Christian Doctrine

• Traditional view: Early Christians separated from Judaism.
• Argument against this view:
  • Peter, Paul, and disciples continued Jewish practices.
  • Christianity initially an extension or type of Judaism.

Conclusion

• Re-evaluation of the term "conversion" in Christian texts.
• Recognition that early Christian leaders did not see themselves abandoning Judaism.
• Historical evidence suggests continuity of Jewish practices among early Christians.