AEP Seminar - Part B End of Course Exam

Introduction

• Speaker: Mrs. Malloy
• Location: Carmel High School, Carmel, Indiana
• Focus: Understanding the task, process, and rubric for Part B of the exam

Task Instructions

• Read four sources and identify a theme or issue
• Write an argument presenting your perspective
• Use at least two sources, linking claims with supporting evidence
• Reference sources as Source A, B, C, or D, or by the author's name

Key Elements of the Task

• Sources: Four sources connected by a theme
• Argument: Logically organized, well-reasoned, and well-written
• Claims and Commentary: Link claims with commentary and evidence
• Debatable Argument: Should be something arguable

Differences from IWA

• IWA requires one source, Part B requires two
• Part B arguments are not drafted multiple times
• Importance of showing genuine argument skills using provided sources

Misconceptions

• Marching Through Sources: Simply summarizing each source is incorrect
• Prepackaged Argument: Avoid manipulating sources to fit a preconceived argument

Correct Process

1. Read Carefully: Read all four sources, annotate key ideas
2. Theme Identification: Identify overarching and nuanced themes
3. Generate Perspective: Formulate a unique perspective or research question
4. Thesis Development: Create a complex main claim or thesis
5. Outline Argument: Plan the structure before writing
6. Counterclaims and Complexity: Address counterclaims and multiple perspectives

Writing the Essay

• Proofreading: Allocate time to review and ensure clarity and legibility
• Timing: Manage time wisely; plan for about 90 minutes
• Score Weight: Part B constitutes 31.5% of the AP score

Planning and Timing

• Digital vs. Paper: Differences in time allocation and flexibility
• Suggested Timing:
  • 25-30 minutes: Plan and read
  • 45-55 minutes: Write
  • 5-10 minutes: Edit

Scoring Components

1. Understanding of Stimulus: True integration of sources
2. Line of Reasoning: Claims, evidence, and commentary
3. Use of Evidence: Selection and authentic use
4. Clarity of Communication: Consistent attribution and clear ideas

Identifying the Theme

• Process: Same as IWA
• Example: 2019 exam themes included consumer culture, materialism, and quality over quantity

Crafting the Argument

• Planning: Structure argument with introduction, subclaims, evidence, counterclaims, and conclusion
• Complexity: Ensure arguments are complex, not just generalizations or clichés

Evidence Integration

• Authentic and essential use of two provided sources
• Avoid manipulation or superficial connections

Conclusion

• "Be Rational" Acronym:
  • R: Read the stimulus
  • A: Authentically identify the theme
  • T: Take a stance
  • I: Identify use of sources
  • O: Outline the argument
  • N: Nourish with commentary and implications
  • A: Attribute sources clearly
  • L: Leave time to proofread

Final Thoughts

• Importance of planning and understanding
• Confidence in skills developed throughout the year
• Wishing students good luck on the exam